That's the perfect way to do it.
The only issue MIGHT be super(Phase.WRITE); That's the same phase as the
SoapOutInterceptor which would be writing the headers. Thus, if your
interceptor happens to run after the SoapOutInterceptor, your header wouldn't
get written. I would suggest moving it to an earlier phase (PRE_PROTOCOL
maybe) or add a "addBefore(SoapOutInterceptor.class.getName())"
Dan
On Fri October 9 2009 6:12:02 am AshAce wrote:
> I'm trying to add a SOAPHeader to my request using a custom soap header
> OutInterceptor. I don't want to use ((BindingProvider)
> proxy).getRequestContext().put(Header.HEADER_LIST, headers);
>
> The class is a such :
>
> public class CustomSoapHeaderOutInterceptor extends AbstractSoapInterceptor
> {
>
> public CustomSoapHeaderOutInterceptor() {
> super(Phase.WRITE);
>
> }
>
> @Override
> public void handleMessage(SoapMessage message) throws Fault{
>
>
> SoapMessage soapMessage = (SoapMessage) message;
> List<Header> list = message.getHeaders();
>
> QName q = new QName("http://commons.cxf.learning.com/";,
> "HeaderService"); Person person = new Person();
> person.setName("one person");
> JAXBDataBinding dataBinding = null;
> try {
> dataBinding = new
> JAXBDataBinding(person.getClass());
> } catch (JAXBException e1) {
> e1.printStackTrace();
> }
>
> SoapHeader header = new SoapHeader(q,person,
> dataBinding);
> list.add(header);
>
> }
> }
>
>
> This seems to work just fine. I just want to know if this is the correct
> way of doing it or do we need to extend some other specific interceptor.
>
--
Daniel Kulp
[email protected]
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
