Thanks Dan
dkulp wrote:
>
>
> That's the perfect way to do it.
>
> The only issue MIGHT be super(Phase.WRITE); That's the same phase as
> the
> SoapOutInterceptor which would be writing the headers. Thus, if your
> interceptor happens to run after the SoapOutInterceptor, your header
> wouldn't
> get written. I would suggest moving it to an earlier phase (PRE_PROTOCOL
> maybe) or add a "addBefore(SoapOutInterceptor.class.getName())"
>
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> On Fri October 9 2009 6:12:02 am AshAce wrote:
>> I'm trying to add a SOAPHeader to my request using a custom soap header
>> OutInterceptor. I don't want to use ((BindingProvider)
>> proxy).getRequestContext().put(Header.HEADER_LIST, headers);
>>
>> The class is a such :
>>
>> public class CustomSoapHeaderOutInterceptor extends
>> AbstractSoapInterceptor
>> {
>>
>> public CustomSoapHeaderOutInterceptor() {
>> super(Phase.WRITE);
>>
>> }
>>
>> @Override
>> public void handleMessage(SoapMessage message) throws Fault{
>>
>>
>> SoapMessage soapMessage = (SoapMessage) message;
>> List<Header> list = message.getHeaders();
>>
>> QName q = new QName("http://commons.cxf.learning.com/";,
>> "HeaderService"); Person person = new Person();
>> person.setName("one person");
>> JAXBDataBinding dataBinding = null;
>> try {
>> dataBinding = new
>> JAXBDataBinding(person.getClass());
>> } catch (JAXBException e1) {
>> e1.printStackTrace();
>> }
>>
>> SoapHeader header = new SoapHeader(q,person,
>> dataBinding);
>> list.add(header);
>>
>> }
>> }
>>
>>
>> This seems to work just fine. I just want to know if this is the correct
>> way of doing it or do we need to extend some other specific interceptor.
>>
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> [email protected]
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Adding-SOAPHeader-using-an-Interceptor-tp25818665p26064017.html
Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
