But the endorsed jaxb is only the API not the impl.

I have included the dep already

Was just wanting make sure there was not a "better" way :-)



Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 21, 2010, at 12:51, Willem Jiang <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Jason,
> 
> If you are not conformable with the JAXB dependency in your pom, you can 
> exclude the artifacts from the cxf-rt-core and add the JAXB 2.2 into your pom.
> 
> If you already endorse the JAXB at the JRE level, the dependency of JAXB 2.1 
> will not bother you. Even it's in your pom, the JVM will load the jaxb class 
> from your endorse directory.
> 
> Willem
> 
> On 12/21/10 9:08 AM, Jason Pell wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I have endorsed them at the JRE level.  I don't want to stuff around
>> with the endorsing from the POM as Eclipse does not deal anyway.
>> I just wanted to know what deps I need to adjust to ensure I am not
>> getting jaxb 2.1 includes from cxf-rt-core.
>> 
>> Cheers
>> Jason
>> 
>> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Willem Jiang<[email protected]>  
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> Even you includes the dependency jaxb/jaxws 2.2 in you pom, if you don't
>>> endorse these jars from maven, maven will still use the jars from JDK.
>>> 
>>> So you need to endorse them yourself in the pom.
>>> 
>>> Willem
>>> 
>>> On 12/21/10 6:07 AM, Jason Pell wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> I can see in the parent pom it's enabled for jdk 5 - but since jdk 5 is
>>>> eol I am hoping there is a convenient way for 6 as or do I need to manually
>>>> include the deps?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Jason
>>>> 
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Willem
>>> ----------------------------------
>>> FuseSource
>>> Web: http://www.fusesource.com
>>> Blog:    http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
>>>         http://jnn.javaeye.com (Chinese)
>>> Twitter: willemjiang
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Willem
> ----------------------------------
> FuseSource
> Web: http://www.fusesource.com
> Blog:    http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
>         http://jnn.javaeye.com (Chinese)
> Twitter: willemjiang

Reply via email to