I would upgrade to a later version (latest 2.4 or latest 2.5) to see if that helps.
2012/1/6 Malisetti, Ramanjaneyulu <[email protected]>: > Hi, > We have scenario where CXF is just started but there is no activity. > But CPU cycles are consumed by Jetty selectors started by CXF endpoints. The > difference between with and without CXF on process performance is in order of > 300%. We are using CXF 2.3. > > Are missing any parameter either at Jetty or CXF? Something seems obviously > wrong with what we have. > > Did anyone observe this? > > Regards > Raman -- -- David J. M. Karlsen - http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidkarlsen
