On Friday, January 06, 2012 12:38:34 PM Malisetti, Ramanjaneyulu wrote:
> Hi,
>          We have scenario where CXF is just started but there is no
> activity. But CPU cycles are consumed by Jetty selectors started by CXF
> endpoints. The difference between with and without CXF on process
> performance is in order of 300%. We are using CXF 2.3.
> 
> Are missing any parameter either at Jetty or CXF? Something seems obviously
> wrong with what we have.
> 
> Did anyone observe this?

Definitely not something I've ever seen before.     Starting up a couple of 
the examples that use Jetty and just letting them sit show's 0 CPU usage.

Can you create an example that shows this.   Even using 2.3.8 would be fine.


-- 
Daniel Kulp
[email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com

Reply via email to