I think that's right! It looks like the _1 references the To that is in the header but is absence in the header and signature for the CXF policy based header.
*Is the "To" supposed to be included based on this part of the policy?* * Here is the correct header:* *And the CXF header:* Thanks for taking the time to help. This is very helpful. Do I need to add a custom interceptor to handle this? Should the Policy interceptor be able to interpret this? Thx again, Gary -- View this message in context: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/More-cxf-wcf-interop-questions-tp5681573p5685984.html Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
