Try uncommenting the "UsingAddress" policy listed in "TransportUT_policy".

Colm.

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Gina Choi <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Colm,
>
> First of all, sorry for massive emails we sent. Alex works in different
> timezone, so we didn't have much common time to debug together. So, we are
> kind of rushing this morning.
>
> We use Fediz STS and try to minimize changes to save time. We tried
> TransportUT_Binding(please see bellow) that shipped with Fediz STS. Since
> it is also referencing Input_policy, I am not sure if it will work as it is.
>
>   <wsdl:binding name="TransportUT_Binding" type="wstrust:STS">
>     <wsp:PolicyReference URI="#TransportUT_policy" />
>       <soap12:binding style="document"
>           transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http"; />
>       <wsdl:operation name="Issue">
>           <soap12:operation
>               soapAction="
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512/RST/Issue"; />
>           <wsdl:input>
>               <wsp:PolicyReference
>                URI="#Input_policy" />
>               <soap12:body use="literal" />
>           </wsdl:input>
>           <wsdl:output>
>               <wsp:PolicyReference
>                URI="#Output_policy" />
>               <soap12:body use="literal" />
>           </wsdl:output>
>       </wsdl:operation>
>       <wsdl:operation name="Validate">
>           <soap12:operation
>               soapAction="
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512/RST/Validate"; />
>           <wsdl:input>
>               <wsp:PolicyReference
>                URI="#Input_policy" />
>               <soap12:body use="literal" />
>           </wsdl:input>
>           <wsdl:output>
>               <wsp:PolicyReference
>                URI="#Output_policy" />
>               <soap12:body use="literal" />
>           </wsdl:output>
>       </wsdl:operation>
>       <wsdl:operation name="Cancel">
>           <soap12:operation
>               soapAction="
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512/RST/Cancel"; />
>           <wsdl:input>
>               <soap12:body use="literal" />
>           </wsdl:input>
>           <wsdl:output>
>               <soap12:body use="literal" />
>           </wsdl:output>
>       </wsdl:operation>
>       <wsdl:operation name="Renew">
>           <soap12:operation
>               soapAction="
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512/RST/Renew"; />
>           <wsdl:input>
>               <soap12:body use="literal" />
>           </wsdl:input>
>           <wsdl:output>
>               <soap12:body use="literal" />
>           </wsdl:output>
>       </wsdl:operation>
>       <wsdl:operation name="KeyExchangeToken">
>           <soap12:operation
>               soapAction="
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512/RST/KeyExchangeToken"; />
>           <wsdl:input>
>               <soap12:body use="literal" />
>           </wsdl:input>
>           <wsdl:output>
>               <soap12:body use="literal" />
>           </wsdl:output>
>       </wsdl:operation>
>       <wsdl:operation name="RequestCollection">
>           <soap12:operation
>               soapAction="
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512/RST/RequestCollection"; />
>           <wsdl:input>
>               <soap12:body use="literal" />
>           </wsdl:input>
>           <wsdl:output>
>               <soap12:body use="literal" />
>           </wsdl:output>
>       </wsdl:operation>
>   </wsdl:binding>
>
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh <[email protected]
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> What security policy are you using for the TransportUT_Port? It sounds
>> like the WS-SecurityPolicy layer is not getting invoked.
>>
>> Colm.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Gina Choi <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Colm,
>>>
>>> Alex and I working together to get this work. I am responsible to
>>> configure Fediz STS for him. Could you take a look following exceptions
>>> from Alex's RST. We decided to use TransportUT_Port. I think that is being
>>> used for WS-Federation SSO as well. Anyway, please ignore previous our
>>> emails. Could you tell us what is wrong with his RST?
>>>
>>>
>>> ID: 1
>>> Address: https://wkqasv0805.global.sdl.corp:9443/fedizidpsts/STSService
>>> Encoding: UTF-8
>>> Http-Method: POST
>>> Content-Type: application/soap+xml; charset=utf-8
>>> Headers: {accept-encoding=[gzip, deflate], connection=[Keep-Alive],
>>> Content-Length=[1908], content-type=[application/soap+xml; charset=utf-8],
>>> expect=
>>> [100-continue], host=[wkqasv0805.global.sdl.corp:9443]}
>>> Payload: <s:Envelope xmlns:s="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope";
>>> xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"; xmlns:u="
>>> http://docs.oasis-open.
>>> org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utility-1.0.xsd"><s:Header><a:Action
>>> s:mustUnderstand="1">http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512
>>>
>>> /RST/Issue</a:Action><a:MessageID>urn:uuid:24a48857-71ec-466e-bfe6-675c08f84c6e</a:MessageID><a:ReplyTo><a:Address>
>>> http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressin
>>> g/anonymous</a:Address></a:ReplyTo><VsDebuggerCausalityData xmlns="
>>> http://schemas.microsoft.com/vstudio/diagnostics/servicemodelsink
>>> ">uIDPo8DHZtWXyK1J
>>> n2JxXCS85z4AAAAAlruHm4rOAUCcZNvbjFb/PND3aSmMn0JLk9BMBxOE9WoACQAA</VsDebuggerCausalityData><a:To
>>> s:mustUnderstand="1">https://wkqasv0805.global.sdl.cor
>>> p:9443/fedizidpsts/STSService</a:To><o:Security s:mustUnderstand="1"
>>> xmlns:o="
>>> http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-secex
>>> t-1.0.xsd"><u:Timestamp
>>> u:Id="_0"><u:Created>2012-07-24T13:27:55.050Z</u:Created><u:Expires>2012-07-24T13:32:55.050Z</u:Expires></u:Timestamp><o:Usern
>>> ameToken
>>> u:Id="uuid-64599397-270f-4886-975c-086f44f45f27-1"><o:Username>gchoi</o:Username><o:Password
>>> Type="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oas
>>>
>>> is-200401-wss-username-token-profile-1.0#PasswordText">gchoi</o:Password></o:UsernameToken></o:Security></s:Header><s:Body><trust:RequestSecurityToken
>>>  
>>> xmlns:trust="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512";><wsp:AppliesTo
>>> xmlns:wsp="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/09/policy";><a:EndpointRef
>>> erence><a:Address>https://medevasarafia01.global.sdl.corp/Agency/
>>> </a:Address></a:EndpointReference></wsp:AppliesTo><trust:KeyType>
>>> http://docs.oasis-op
>>> en.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512/Bearer</trust:KeyType><trust:RequestType>
>>> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512/Issue
>>> </trust:RequestType><trust
>>>
>>> :TokenType>urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.0:assertion</trust:TokenType></trust:RequestSecurityToken></s:Body></s:Envelope>
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> SLF4J: Failed to load class "org.slf4j.impl.StaticLoggerBinder".
>>> SLF4J: Defaulting to no-operation (NOP) logger implementation
>>> SLF4J: See http://www.slf4j.org/codes.html#StaticLoggerBinder for
>>> further details.
>>>                 [LdapLoginModule] authentication-only mode; SSL disabled
>>>                 [LdapLoginModule] user provider:
>>> ldap://wkqasv0805.global.sdl.corp:389/ou=People,dc=maxcrc,dc=com
>>>                 [LdapLoginModule] attempting to authenticate user: gchoi
>>>                 [LdapLoginModule] authentication succeeded
>>>                 [LdapLoginModule] added LdapPrincipal
>>> "cn=gchoi,ou=People,dc=maxcrc,dc=com" to Subject
>>>                 [LdapLoginModule] added UserPrincipal "gchoi" to Subject
>>> Jul 24, 2012 9:28:00 AM org.apache.cxf.phase.PhaseInterceptorChain
>>> doDefaultLogging
>>> WARNING: Interceptor for {
>>> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512/}SecurityTokenService#{http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512/}Va
>>> lidate has thrown exception, unwinding now
>>> org.apache.cxf.binding.soap.SoapFault: MustUnderstand headers: [{
>>> http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing}Action, {
>>> http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing}To
>>> ] are not understood.
>>>         at
>>> org.apache.cxf.binding.soap.interceptor.MustUnderstandInterceptor.checkUltimateReceiverHeaders(MustUnderstandInterceptor.java:150)
>>>         at
>>> org.apache.cxf.binding.soap.interceptor.MustUnderstandInterceptor.handleMessage(MustUnderstandInterceptor.java:96)
>>>         at
>>> org.apache.cxf.binding.soap.interceptor.MustUnderstandInterceptor.handleMessage(MustUnderstandInterceptor.java:49)
>>>         at
>>> org.apache.cxf.phase.PhaseInterceptorChain.doIntercept(PhaseInterceptorChain.java:262)
>>>         at
>>> org.apache.cxf.transport.ChainInitiationObserver.onMessage(ChainInitiationObserver.java:122)
>>>         at
>>> org.apache.cxf.transport.http.AbstractHTTPDestination.invoke(AbstractHTTPDestination.java:211)
>>>         at
>>> org.apache.cxf.transport.servlet.ServletController.invokeDestination(ServletController.java:213)
>>>         at
>>> org.apache.cxf.transport.servlet.ServletController.invoke(ServletController.java:193)
>>>         at
>>> org.apache.cxf.transport.servlet.CXFNonSpringServlet.invoke(CXFNonSpringServlet.java:129)
>>>         at
>>> org.apache.cxf.transport.servlet.AbstractHTTPServlet.handleRequest(AbstractHTTPServlet.java:187)
>>>         at
>>> org.apache.cxf.transport.servlet.AbstractHTTPServlet.doPost(AbstractHTTPServlet.java:110)
>>>         at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:641)
>>>         at
>>> org.apache.cxf.transport.servlet.AbstractHTTPServlet.service(AbstractHTTPServlet.java:166)
>>>         at
>>> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:305)
>>>         at
>>> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:210)
>>>         at
>>> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:225)
>>>         at
>>> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:169)
>>>         at
>>> org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:472)
>>>         at
>>> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:168)
>>>         at
>>> org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:98)
>>>         at
>>> org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve.invoke(AccessLogValve.java:927)
>>>         at
>>> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:118)
>>>         at
>>> org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:407)
>>>         at
>>> org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.process(AbstractHttp11Processor.java:999)
>>>         at
>>> org.apache.coyote.AbstractProtocol$AbstractConnectionHandler.process(AbstractProtocol.java:565)
>>>         at
>>> org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$SocketProcessor.run(JIoEndpoint.java:307)
>>>         at
>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(Unknown Source)
>>>         at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown
>>> Source)
>>>         at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
>>> Jul 24, 2012 9:28:00 AM
>>> org.apache.cxf.binding.soap.interceptor.Soap12FaultOutInterceptor$Soap12FaultOutInterceptorInternal
>>> handleMessage
>>> INFO: class
>>> org.apache.cxf.binding.soap.interceptor.Soap12FaultOutInterceptor$Soap12FaultOutInterceptorInternalapplication/soap+xml
>>> Jul 24, 2012 9:28:00 AM
>>> org.apache.cxf.services.SecurityTokenService.TransportUT_Port.STS
>>> INFO: Outbound Message
>>> ---------------------------
>>> ID: 1
>>> Response-Code: 500
>>> Encoding: UTF-8
>>> Content-Type: application/soap+xml
>>> Headers: {}
>>> Payload: <soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="
>>> http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope
>>> "><soap:Body><soap:Fault><soap:Code><soap:Value>soap:MustUnderstand</soap:V
>>> alue></soap:Code><soap:Reason><soap:Text xml:lang="en">MustUnderstand
>>> headers: [{http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing}Action, {
>>> http://www.w3.org/2005/
>>> 08/addressing}To] are not
>>> understood.</soap:Text></soap:Reason></soap:Fault></soap:Body></soap:Envelope>
>>> --------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Gina Choi <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Colm,
>>>>
>>>> I would like to confirm if I understand you correctly. So, do we need
>>>> to add following content to Fediz STS wsdl file to issue a token? At this
>>>> point we mostly interested in(minimum) issuing a a token. I am not sure if
>>>> we need to "Validate" operation to issue a RSTR.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <!-- 2.1.1.3 UsernameToken with timestamp, nonce and password hash -->
>>>> <wsp:Policy wsu:Id="DoubleItDigestPolicy">
>>>>   <sp:SupportingTokens>
>>>>     <wsp:Policy>
>>>>       <sp:UsernameToken sp:IncludeToken="
>>>> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702/IncludeToken/AlwaysToRecipient
>>>> ">
>>>>         <wsp:Policy>
>>>>           <sp:HashPassword />
>>>>         </wsp:Policy>
>>>>       </sp:UsernameToken>
>>>>     </wsp:Policy>
>>>>   </sp:SupportingTokens>
>>>> </wsp:Policy>
>>>> <wsdl:binding name="DoubleItDigestBinding" type="tns:DoubleItPortType">
>>>>   <wsp:PolicyReference URI="#DoubleItDigestPolicy" />
>>>>   <soap:binding style="document"
>>>>   transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http"; />
>>>>   <wsdl:operation name="Issue">
>>>>     <soap:operation soapAction="
>>>> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512/RST/Issue"; />
>>>>     <wsdl:input>
>>>>       <soap:body use="literal" />
>>>>     </wsdl:input>
>>>>     <wsdl:output>
>>>>       <soap:body use="literal" />
>>>>     </wsdl:output>
>>>>   </wsdl:operation>
>>>> </wsdl:binding>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Gina
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> You could use a SecurityPolicy that just requires a UsernameToken
>>>>> without a
>>>>> binding. For example see the policy "<!-- 2.1.1.3 UsernameToken with
>>>>> timestamp, nonce and password hash -->" starting on line 214:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/cxf/trunk/systests/ws-security-examples/src/test/resources/org/apache/cxf/systest/wssec/examples/ut/DoubleItUt.wsdl?view=markup
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course, in practise one would combine a UsernameToken with the
>>>>> Transport
>>>>> binding to secure the message exchange...
>>>>>
>>>>> Colm.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Sarafian <[email protected]
>>>>> >wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > I have a C# code that asks the STS for a token using username
>>>>> password
>>>>> > credentials.
>>>>> > I'm using the UT or UTEncrypted endpoints but I get this error:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > These policy alternatives can not be satisfied:
>>>>> > {
>>>>> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702}ProtectionToken
>>>>> > {
>>>>> >
>>>>> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702}IncludeTimestamp
>>>>> > :
>>>>> > Received Timestamp does not match the requirements
>>>>> > {
>>>>> >
>>>>> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702}SymmetricBinding
>>>>> > :
>>>>> > Received Timestamp does not match the requirements
>>>>> > {
>>>>> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702}SignedParts:
>>>>> > {http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/}Body not SIGNED
>>>>> > {
>>>>> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702}EncryptedParts
>>>>> :
>>>>> > {http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/}Body not ENCRYPTED
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Is there a way for the STS to be configured not to apply the above
>>>>> > policies?
>>>>> > Is there another endpoint for these kind of things?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I simply want to use a username/password credential combination to
>>>>> request
>>>>> > a
>>>>> > security token.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > --
>>>>> > View this message in context:
>>>>> >
>>>>> http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/RequestSecurityToken-without-Encrypting-and-Signing-tp5711426.html
>>>>> > Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Colm O hEigeartaigh
>>>>>
>>>>> Talend Community Coder
>>>>> http://coders.talend.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Colm O hEigeartaigh
>>
>> Talend Community Coder
>> http://coders.talend.com
>>
>>
>


-- 
Colm O hEigeartaigh

Talend Community Coder
http://coders.talend.com

Reply via email to