Hi,
I have a web service "wsdl first" with wsdl 1.1 and soap 1.2.
Reading WS-I - R1144
and SOAP 1.2 Addressing 1.0 Feature
if the action attribute inside the http header Content-Type is provided it
has to be processed and validated with the soap:operation/@soapAction and
was:Action header.
but CXF seems to handle faults in a non standard way:
SoapActionInInterceptor throws a general Fault instead of
was:InvalidAddressingHeader if the action attribute from http header
Content-Type is not correct (different value from the one inside the WSDL
soap:operation/@soapAction being called or provided soap header
"wsa:Action")
throw new Fault("SOAP_ACTION_MISMATCH", LOG, null, action);
I have also another question, if the soap:operation/@soapAction in the WSDL
is empty shouldn't it be calculated by CXF using the default action patter
as described here
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-ws-addr-wsdl-20060529/#defactionwsdl11 and
compared to http header action attribute inside Content-Type?
thank you.
regards,
Paolo
--
View this message in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/SOAPAction-tp5718944.html
Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
