Hi Sergey.

Sure, so long as it's possible for the service implementation to map an 
attachment to the the generated temp file, that'd work.  I guess for the 
particular use case I was describing it's slightly less clean, since the user 
needs to take into account the fact that the data may be in memory rather than 
on disk.  But then having access to the file itself is more flexible.

Yours,
Henry


On 12 Jan 2014, at 18:19, Sergey Beryozkin <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Henry, Dan,
> 
> Should we offer an interface for users to create a temporary file instead ?
> For example, by default a temp file is created in the system temp drive, 
> developers can customize it by creating a temp File in the right location and 
> with the more user-friendly name if needed ?
> 
> Cheers. Sergey

Reply via email to