Why not write a test-case for this scenario?

Colm.

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Jose María Zaragoza <[email protected]>
wrote:

> 2015-02-27 12:22 GMT+01:00 Colm O hEigeartaigh <[email protected]>:
> >> But , what is a CA certificate chain for ? I would like don't have to
> >> verify the trustability of a certificate manually before importing it.
> >
> > When you need to verify trust in a certificate, CXF essentially asks your
> > truststore two questions:
> >
> > a) Is this certificate stored in the truststore (direct trust)
> > b) Is the issuer of this certificate stored in the truststore, and is the
> > cert chain correct, etc.
>
>
>
> Sorry ( again ), but one question more:
>
> what if I store the trusted CA certificates in  ( ie, b mode ) but
> server certificate has expired ?
>
> In a) mode , I know that it is deemed to be trusted , but I'm not sure
> in b) mode
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> >
> > Obviously directly storing certificates in the truststore does not scale.
> > It might be useful for some scenarios though. The normal way of doing
> > things is to just store your trusted CA certs in there.
> >
> > Colm.
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Jose María Zaragoza <
> [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> 2015-02-27 11:28 GMT+01:00 Colm O hEigeartaigh <[email protected]>:
> >> > What is the concept of a "truststore" other than a collection of
> trusted
> >> > certificates? If you don't trust the certificate then don't put it in
> >> > there... :-)
> >>
> >> Yes, it's true. :-)
> >> But , what is a CA certificate chain for ? I would like don't have to
> >> verify the trustability of a certificate manually before importing it.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Colm.
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Jose María Zaragoza <
> >> [email protected]>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> 2015-02-27 11:06 GMT+01:00 Colm O hEigeartaigh <[email protected]
> >:
> >> >> > No, if the certificate itself is in the truststore then it is
> deemed
> >> to
> >> >> be
> >> >> > trusted - the CA certificate does not need to be in there as well.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Colm.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks.
> >> >> Is this the standard behaviour in JSSE ?
> >> >> I think that it should be validated all CA in the chain, to be sure
> >> >> the certificate is signed by trusted CA
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Jose María Zaragoza <
> >> >> [email protected]>
> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> 2015-02-26 23:38 GMT+01:00 Colm O hEigeartaigh <
> [email protected]
> >> >:
> >> >> >> > I did a quick test using CXF's WebClient doing a "GET" on
> >> >> >> > https://www.google.com. It works fine when you don't specify
> any
> >> >> >> > TLSClientParameters as expected, as it picks up the default
> >> cacerts.
> >> >> >> > However, when I added the following it fails (also as expected):
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >  <http:conduit name="https://.*";>
> >> >> >> >       <http:tlsClientParameters disableCNCheck="true">
> >> >> >> >         <sec:trustManagers>
> >> >> >> >           <sec:keyStore type="jks" password="cspass"
> >> >> >> > resource="clientstore.jks"/>
> >> >> >> >         </sec:trustManagers>
> >> >> >> >       </http:tlsClientParameters>
> >> >> >> >    </http:conduit>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Colm.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> OK. That's right.
> >> >> >> But , if you import Google certificate into clientstore.jks but
> you
> >> >> >> don't import its CA certificate ( GeoTrust CA , in this case ),
> >> should
> >> >> >> it fail ? This is my question
> >> >> >> I don't know what is the validation path that JSSE follows
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Regards
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 10:07 PM, Jose María Zaragoza <
> >> >> >> [email protected]>
> >> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> 2015-02-26 22:23 GMT+01:00 Sergey Beryozkin <
> [email protected]
> >> >:
> >> >> >> >> > What I meant is that you do use a self signed cert to sign a
> >> >> >> previously
> >> >> >> >> > generated certificate but do not import this self signed cert
> >> into
> >> >> the
> >> >> >> >> > truststore which would emulate the same situation you have
> now
> >> >> without
> >> >> >> >> > having to provide a test where well known providers sign a
> given
> >> >> >> server
> >> >> >> >> > certificate.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> OK
> >> >> >> >> I'll try it
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Thanks
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > Sergey
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > On 26/02/15 18:51, Jose María Zaragoza wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> 2015-02-26 18:09 GMT+01:00 Sergey Beryozkin <
> >> [email protected]
> >> >> >:
> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >> >>> Hi
> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >> >>> I guess this is what Colm is implying, that the actual
> problem
> >> >> that
> >> >> >> it
> >> >> >> >> >>> does
> >> >> >> >> >>> work.
> >> >> >> >> >>> Can it be reproduced by a given server certificate with a
> >> >> >> self-signed
> >> >> >> >> >>> certificate validating it ?
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> Well, I don't have a testcase right now. I'll try to
> reproduce
> >> it
> >> >> .
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> With a self signed certificate , the behaviour also is the
> same
> >> >> >> >> >> But that makes sense ( for me ) , because your CA is
> yourself,
> >> so
> >> >> you
> >> >> >> >> >> could trust on it ( if the certificate is imported into your
> >> >> keystore
> >> >> >> >> >> )
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> Regards
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >> >>> Cheers, Sergey
> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >> >>> On 26/02/15 16:55, Jose María Zaragoza wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>> 2015-02-26 17:47 GMT+01:00 Colm O hEigeartaigh <
> >> >> >> [email protected]>:
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>> It does, but only if no truststore has been configured in
> >> CXF.
> >> >> Do
> >> >> >> you
> >> >> >> >> >>>>> have a
> >> >> >> >> >>>>> test-case that reproduces this problem?
> >> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>> Thanks, not really
> >> >> >> >> >>>> Indeed, it's not a problem because my client works fine ,
> >> but I
> >> >> >> cannot
> >> >> >> >> >>>> understand why. I only imported the server certificate, no
> >> the
> >> >> >> others
> >> >> >> >> >>>> in chain
> >> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>> As I don't know how the underlying certificate validation
> is
> >> >> >> performed
> >> >> >> >> >>>> , I don't know if this behaviour is caused by default
> >> settings
> >> >> in
> >> >> >> CXF
> >> >> >> >> >>>> or another reason.
> >> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>> Regards
> >> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>> Colm.
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Jose María Zaragoza
> >> >> >> >> >>>>> <[email protected]>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> 2015-02-26 17:14 GMT+01:00 Colm O hEigeartaigh <
> >> >> >> [email protected]
> >> >> >> >> >:
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> You are using "keyManagers" instead of "trustManagers"
> in
> >> the
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> configuration. "keyManagers" is used when you need to
> >> >> specify a
> >> >> >> key
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> for
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> client authentication. "trustManagers" is used to
> verify
> >> >> trust
> >> >> >> in
> >> >> >> >> the
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> server's cert. As you have no "trustManagers"
> >> configuration
> >> >> >> here, I
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> guess
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> it is falling back on the default JVM settings
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> (javax.net.ssl.trustStore)
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> Sorry, it was a typo. I'm using trustManagers
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> <sec:trustManagers>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>                 <sec:keyStore type="JKS"
> password="*******"
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> resource="truststore.jks"/>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>             </sec:trustManagers>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> <sec:cipherSuitesFilter>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> Do you know if JSSE ( I guess it's the underlying TLS
> >> >> >> >> implementation )
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> uses default JVM truststore for checking certificates ?
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> Thanks
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Colm.
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Jose María Zaragoza
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> <[email protected]>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Hello:
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Maybe this question a bit off topic , but I try to
> >> >> understand
> >> >> >> why
> >> >> >> >> my
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> client works.
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> I use CXF 2.7.8 to call a remote webservice by HTTPS
> (SSL
> >> >> /TLS)
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> This is my settings:
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> <http-conf:conduit name="https://.*";>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>     <http-conf:tlsClientParameters>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>     <sec:keyManagers keyPassword="xxxxxxxx">
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>           <sec:keyStore type="JKS" password="xxxxxxxx"
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> resource="truststore.jks"/>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>      </sec:keyManagers>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> I've imported SSL server certificate into
> truststore.jks
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> And it works fine.
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> But this certificate is signed by a CA chain ( from .
> >> >> >> godaddy.com)
> >> >> >> >> ,
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> and ( I think ) I don't have imported any certificate
> >> from
> >> >> >> godaddy
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Why does my client trust in the server certificate ?
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Is not  performed some Certification Path Validation
> >> >> process ?
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Thanks and regards
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> --
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Colm O hEigeartaigh
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Talend Community Coder
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> http://coders.talend.com
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>> --
> >> >> >> >> >>>>> Colm O hEigeartaigh
> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>>> Talend Community Coder
> >> >> >> >> >>>>> http://coders.talend.com
> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >> >>> --
> >> >> >> >> >>> Sergey Beryozkin
> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >> >>> Talend Community Coders
> >> >> >> >> >>> http://coders.talend.com/
> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >> >>> Blog: http://sberyozkin.blogspot.com
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > --
> >> >> >> > Colm O hEigeartaigh
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Talend Community Coder
> >> >> >> > http://coders.talend.com
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --
> >> >> > Colm O hEigeartaigh
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Talend Community Coder
> >> >> > http://coders.talend.com
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Colm O hEigeartaigh
> >> >
> >> > Talend Community Coder
> >> > http://coders.talend.com
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Colm O hEigeartaigh
> >
> > Talend Community Coder
> > http://coders.talend.com
>
> --
> Colm O hEigeartaigh
>
> Talend Community Coder
> http://coders.talend.com
>
>

Reply via email to