Thanks for you reply Christian!
cschneider wrote > It depends a bit on how you setup your reply scheme if this is possible Could you elaborate on how I go about setting up a reply scheme? This is something I'm trying to find more information and documentation around. cschneider wrote > I am not sure about the CachingConnectionFactory though. In the old JMS > code (pre CXF 3) this was necessary but in the new code a > PoolingConnectionFactory should be better. I was under the impression that PoolingConnectionFactory (PooledConnectionFactory?) is tightly coupled to active mq (I'm using tibco) but I will give that a shot as well. The CachingConnectionFactory gives a decent performance boost compared to not using one according to my tests. Thanks -- View this message in context: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/SOAP-over-JMS-Lifecycle-of-response-queue-consumer-tp5765203p5765285.html Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
