Hi, No problem, all I need is a quick confirmation if you like the solution, then I can extend it to support more nested restrictions and polish everything up (I'd suggest moving all the beanvalidation methods into a separate utiltiy class).
After SourceGenerator is fine, I can take a look at the WadlGenerator and try to generate the parameter restrictions into a separate grammar. Yes, it's great the talk has been accepted, looking forward to meet you in Seville! Best regards, Johannes -- View this message in context: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/WadlGenerator-Bean-validation-support-for-complex-types-tp5771709p5773185.html Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
