Hi Drew,

Drew Jensen wrote:
Ocke Janssen wrote:
Moin Drew,

Drew Jensen wrote:
Will it be possible to generate Base files in OOo 3.0 that are backwards compatible to OO.o versions < 2.4?
No. That isn't planed.

Thanks.

So I don't do again what I did with an image control question recently ( attempting to tell the person that wrote the code how their code works.. gees, the nerve of some people. ) let me ask another question.

Is this a technical concern then or a resources concern?
It was a technical concern to write ODF (2.x Base does not write ODF) but that should hinder you to submit an issue ;-)

I can open a file created in 2.x under 3.0, update data and close the file and it is still readable in 2.x. Change a query, tweak a form, or add a report, save it and it is not. ( There is no warning that the file format is about to be changed by the way, it just silently does it...an RFE perahps? )

Open this ODF 1.2 formatted file in OO.o 2.4 and save it again, now it is readable in 2.3.1 and below. ( again no warning that the file format is being changed, would such a warning be relevant or even possible to get into 2.4.1 given the date? )

Back in versions 2.3.1 and below it gets a little fuzzy as to what happened to the file. If you try to open the file via File>Open the select filter dialog opens, of course there is nothing there that will help you. However if you do File>Database>Open then the base module just quietly closes - no filter dialog box, no error box, it simply does nothing. ( under XP anyway - haven't been able to test this on Linux yet )

This does not seem to fit with the precedence set by other modules - Writer and Calc can each generate files of legacy formats. Indeed when an .sdw file is opened in 3.0 and one selects File>Save a prompt ( assuming it is not explicitly turned off ) asks whether to covert the file to ODF format or to keep the current format.

It was my understanding that one of the driving forces behind the creation of the all-in-one file format was so that databases could be more easily exchanged between different individuals. This then seems like a problem as you can not expect that everyone is always running the most current version of the application.

Even if a filter for the older file format is a problem then at least a warning to the user that the file format is about to be changed seems appropriate. Since there is going to be no way to address the lack of information presented to the < 2.4 user if this file format change takes place during an exchange of files then it becomes imperative, IMO, to make it clear to the 3.x user.
Yes, it has been forgotten to show this message box for Base. But this issue (no number at hand) will be fixed for 3.0.

Best regards,

Ocke

Drew



--
Ocke Janssen                      Tel: +49 40 23646 661, x66661
Dipl. Inf(FH)                     Fax: +49 40 23646 550
Sun Microsystems Inc.
Nagelsweg 55                     mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
D-20097 Hamburg                   http://www.sun.com/staroffice

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1, D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten
Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Thomas Schroeder Wolfgang Engels, Dr. Roland Boemer
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Haering


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to