Yes it is. Best regards, Ivo Limmen
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 1:19 PM, John D. Ament <[email protected]> wrote: > Ivo, > > You should not add @Repository to this class. Is it still discovered then? > > John > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 7:12 AM Ivo Limmen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi John, > > > > I am trying to AVOID discovery of the repository as it is a abstract base > > repository with common utility methods. I tried by adding @Repository but > > it does not work. > > I tried adding @Exclude on the repository but the RepositoryExtension > does > > not filter on @Exclude annotated repositories. > > > > Best regards, > > Ivo Limmen > > > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 1:09 PM, John D. Ament <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Ivo, > > > > > > For any repository to be discovered, it should be annotated > @Repository. > > > If this is your own custom class, I would simply remove that > annotation. > > > > > > John > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 6:42 AM Ivo Limmen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi list, > > > > > > > > I am using DeltaSpike for my project and I like it very much. But I > am > > > > trying to exclude an abstract repository (my own abstract base > > > repository) > > > > from being picked up by the RepositoryExtention. > > > > I tried @Exclude but that does not work. Then I discovered that 1.8.1 > > was > > > > release (I used 1.8.0) but that did not help either. > > > > I saw that the method RepositoryExtension.isRepository() does not > > > exclude > > > > any interfaces or abstract classes; it this feature missing? > > > > Or am I using it wrong? > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Ivo Limmen > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Met vriendelijke groet, > > > > Ivo Limmen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Met vriendelijke groet, > > Ivo Limmen > > > -- Met vriendelijke groet, Ivo Limmen
