Thanks John. I going to test it tomorrow I hope... Currently I have it like:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <beans xmlns="http://xmlns.jcp.org/xml/ns/javaee"; xmlns:xsi=" http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; xsi:schemaLocation="http://xmlns.jcp.org/xml/ns/javaee http://xmlns.jcp.org/xml/ns/javaee/beans_1_1.xsd"; version="1.2" bean-discovery-mode="annotated"> <alternatives> <class>org.apache.deltaspike.jpa.impl.transaction.ContainerManagedTransactionStrategy</class> </alternatives> </beans> which as you pointed out might not work. I also do my TX demarcation at the service level (business logic). A Service can use multiple repos, jms, ... Repo should only concern about persisting and querying data. Regards, LA On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 9:44 PM, John D. Ament <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Yes, Mark's input is definitely useful. I can say I've been using DS + > Repositories + JTA Transactional for a few years now, it all continues to > work fine. I'm on Wildfly 10.1 as well. > > The only thing you need to remember is to > add globalAlternatives.org.apache.deltaspike.jpa.spi.transaction. > TransactionStrategy=org.apache.deltaspike.jpa.impl.transaction. > ContainerManagedTransactionStrategy > to your META-INF/apache-deltaspike.properties file. This is covered at > http://deltaspike.apache.org/documentation/jpa.html#JTASupport for > Weld/Wildfly instances > > Then you'll get the seamless transactions between DS repositories, other > JPA use cases, and JMS, etc. Presently I deal with the JMS + SMTP + JPA > use case today and haven't seen it falter too much. > > I don't add @Transactional to my repositories, the transaction boundary > tends to be at a higher level (Services). > > John > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 3:41 PM Luís Alves <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I want to use DS repositories, that's why I've asked about Transactional. > > As I use Wildfly 10, I can use the standard Transactional instead of the > DS > > one. > > @Mark: thanks for your point of view. I wan't to stay as standard as > > possible, but if I have strange behaviors I'll switch for DS annotation. > > Tomorrow I have to deal with some JMS configs, but I'll try to do some > > testing until the end of this week. I was out for a month and my > colleagues > > are injecting the EntityManager into the @Repositories, because they had > > some issues with the TX. I suspect that, this is not a good idea, as DS > > repositories should own their own EntityManager instance. > > > > Regards > > > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 8:20 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > Please note that @javax.transaction.Transactional and deltaspike > > > @Transactional work pretty different under the hood. > > > > > > With javax.transaction.Transactional you will get the weird > transaction > > > handling of EJB [1]. > > > It's also not that portable as it seems. There are huge definition gaps > > in > > > the tx spec as well. E.g. whether you can catch Exceptions, transaction > > > boundaries etc. > > > > > > Needless to say I'm not a fan of javax.transaction.Transactional ;) > > > > > > LieGrue, > > > strub > > > > > > > > > [1] https://struberg.wordpress.com/2015/04/21/transaction- > > > and-exception-handling-in-ejbs-and-javaee7-transactional/ > > > > > > > > > > Am 06.02.2018 um 20:38 schrieb Mauro Chi <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > If you use wildfly10 it came with jeee7 that already came with > > > > annotation@Transactional. > > > > > > > > So if you use wildfy 10 you dont have to use deltaspike. > > > > Mauro > > > > > > > > Il 6 feb 2018 19:31, "Luís Alves" <[email protected]> ha > scritto: > > > > > > > >> Left the office already...It's wildfly 10 dot something. I'll give > the > > > >> exact version and strategy used tomorrow. > > > >> > > > >> Regards > > > >> > > > >> Em 06/02/2018 18:11, "John D. Ament" <[email protected]> > > escreveu: > > > >> > > > >>> Yes, in general javax.transaction.Transactional works well. > > Depending > > > >> on > > > >>> your server, you may need to just point to the container managed > > > >>> transaction approach. What container are you deploying to > (including > > > >>> version)? > > > >>> > > > >>> On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 12:37 PM Luís Alves <[email protected]> > > > >> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> Will deltaspike work with javax.transaction.Transactional? > > > >>>> Do I need to specify an interceptor? > > > >>>> Where can I find an example? > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
