ah, ignore my question, I had a network issue so didn't see all the responses
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Kiran Ayyagari <[email protected]> wrote: > can you provide a little more info: > > 1. version of the server > 2. OS version > 3. what is the ~size of each entry > > and finally are you using filters with exact match or substring match? > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:01 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, we have a project has 80,000 users in one OU. This is a requirement. >> >> With guidance from this group, I've tried dozens of combinations of indexing >> attributes, setting their cache sizes, >> increasing the partition caches, timeout settings, etc. >> >> We're using the 64 bit java service wrapper and have given the JVM 5GB of >> memory. >> Despite this, we still have 20+ second response times when searching on >> displayName and employeeNumber . >> This is consistent with multiple ldap clients. >> >> Every time we've made configuration or index changes, it's been to a clean >> empty system and then we load our LDIF file with the 80k users. >> >> You've all been very helpful to us but we're backed into wall with this. >> The response times are unacceptable and we don't know what else we can do. >> >> Could someone provide us with an idea of how to configure the system to get >> the best performance when searching >> for displayName and employeeNumber? The displayName lengths are up to 80 >> characters, the employeeNumber is 25. >> >> Thank you! >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > Kiran Ayyagari -- Kiran Ayyagari
