users  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: allocating a mempool w/ rte_pktmbuf_pool_create() Dmitry Kozlyuk
• re: ports and queues fwefew 4t4tg
• Can we expand the max_nb_queue_pairs for AES-NI Multi Buffer Crypto PMD? Changchun Zhang
• Linux / MLX4 / ConnectX-3 / secondary process support Michael Mason
• How to add veth interfaces in dpdk krishna bansal
  • Re: How to add veth interfaces in dpdk Stephen Hemminger
• DPDK bond can not start in SR-IOV [email protected]
• how to enable lib_pdump? Jon Ross
  • Re: how to enable lib_pdump? Stephen Hemminger
• Compiling DPDK failed on ARM64 haofan zhuo
  • RE: Compiling DPDK failed on ARM64 김문정
• Question: DPDK thread model fwefew 4t4tg
  • Re: Question: DPDK thread model Stephen Hemminger
• net_mlx5: unable to recognize master/representors on the multiple IB devices Rocio Dominguez
  • Re: net_mlx5: unable to recognize master/representors on the multiple IB devices Thomas Monjalon
  • RE: net_mlx5: unable to recognize master/representors on the multiple IB devices Asaf Penso
  • RE: net_mlx5: unable to recognize master/representors on the multiple IB devices Rocio Dominguez
  • Re: net_mlx5: unable to recognize master/representors on the multiple IB devices Asaf Penso
  • RE: net_mlx5: unable to recognize master/representors on the multiple IB devices Rocio Dominguez
  • RE: net_mlx5: unable to recognize master/representors on the multiple IB devices Asaf Penso
  • RE: net_mlx5: unable to recognize master/representors on the multiple IB devices Rocio Dominguez
  • Re: net_mlx5: unable to recognize master/representors on the multiple IB devices Asaf Penso
  • RE: net_mlx5: unable to recognize master/representors on the multiple IB devices Rocio Dominguez
  • RE: net_mlx5: unable to recognize master/representors on the multiple IB devices Asaf Penso
  • RE: net_mlx5: unable to recognize master/representors on the multiple IB devices Rocio Dominguez
  • Re: net_mlx5: unable to recognize master/representors on the multiple IB devices Asaf Penso
  • Re: net_mlx5: unable to recognize master/representors on the multiple IB devices Muhammad Zain-ul-Abideen
  • RE: net_mlx5: unable to recognize master/representors on the multiple IB devices Rocio Dominguez
• Trouble bringing up dpdk testpmd with Mellanox ports Sindhura Bandi
  • Re: Trouble bringing up dpdk testpmd with Mellanox ports PATRICK KEROULAS
  • Re: Trouble bringing up dpdk testpmd with Mellanox ports Sindhura Bandi
  • Re: Trouble bringing up dpdk testpmd with Mellanox ports madhukar mythri
• Potential bug with the X540-AT2 driver (upon missed packets), DPDK 21.11 Vinay Purohit
• RE: [dpdk-users] Accessing packet data from different lcores [email protected]
  • RE: [dpdk-users] Accessing packet data from different lcores [email protected]
  • Re: [dpdk-users] Accessing packet data from different lcores Stephen Hemminger
  • RE: [dpdk-users] Accessing packet data from different lcores [email protected]
  • Re: [dpdk-users] Accessing packet data from different lcores Stephen Hemminger
• rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk vs rte_pktmbuf_free Filip Janiszewski
  • Re: rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk vs rte_pktmbuf_free Stephen Hemminger
  • Re: rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk vs rte_pktmbuf_free Filip Janiszewski
• RE: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-users] A question about Mellanox ConnectX-5 and ConnectX-4 Lx nic can't send packets? Dmitry Kozlyuk
  • RE: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-users] A question about Mellanox ConnectX-5 and ConnectX-4 Lx nic can't send packets? Dmitry Kozlyuk
• RE: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-users] A question about the link status of the intel E810 nic can not be up? Zhang, Qi Z
• Used on windows 2019, but the network card adapter could not be found 陈煜
  • Re: Used on windows 2019, but the network card adapter could not be found Dmitry Kozlyuk
• Used on windows 2019, the network card adapter could not be found 陈煜
• Regarding Qos: CIR, PIR, CBS & EBS Configuration neeraj . sj
• Regarding Qos: CIR, PIR, CBS & EBS Configuration neeraj . sj
• Accessing packet data from different lcores [email protected]
• [ICE DPDK 21.11] Latency bump at certain rate Yueyang Pan
  • Re: [ICE DPDK 21.11] Latency bump at certain rate Anantharam, Arjun
  • Re: [ICE DPDK 21.11] Latency bump at certain rate neeraj . sj
• Unexpected behavior when using mbuf pool with external buffers Michał Niciejewski
  • RE: Unexpected behavior when using mbuf pool with external buffers Van Haaren, Harry
  • Re: Unexpected behavior when using mbuf pool with external buffers Michał Niciejewski
  • Re: Unexpected behavior when using mbuf pool with external buffers Michał Niciejewski
  • Re: Unexpected behavior when using mbuf pool with external buffers Gábor LENCSE
  • Unexpected behavior when using mbuf pool with external buffers Michał Niciejewski
• Concept clarification on NICS with multiple queues fwefew 4t4tg
  • Re: Concept clarification on NICS with multiple queues Stephen Hemminger
• solved: dpdk-devbind.py fail on AWS c5n.metal instance running 'Amazon Linux 2 Kernel 5.10 fwefew 4t4tg
• dpdk-devbind.py fail on AWS c5n.metal instance running 'Amazon Linux 2 Kernel 5.10' fwefew 4t4tg
• drivers/common/cnxk warning fwefew 4t4tg
• Compile DPDK for Intel Westmere Prabhuram K
• IP reassembly can cause memory corruption? Purnima, Kompella V
• ip_pipeline asssssssssss 代彦龙
• Re:users Digest, Vol 318, Issue 1 代彦龙
  • Re: users Digest, Vol 318, Issue 1 Ruslan R . Laishev
• DPDK 20.08, select drivrs to build Ruslan R. Laishev
  • Re: DPDK 20.08, select drivrs to build Dmitry Kozlyuk
  • Re: DPDK 20.08, select drivrs to build Ruslan R . Laishev
• DPDK bond mode 4 cares about the boot sequence of the slave device Hong Christian
• rte flow rule not clear with DPDK 21.11 and Intel E810 Filip Janiszewski
  • Re: rte flow rule not clear with DPDK 21.11 and Intel E810 Filip Janiszewski
  • Re: rte flow rule not clear with DPDK 21.11 and Intel E810 Massimo Girondi
• Failed to create flow rule using E810 while setting priority 1 Filip Janiszewski
• rte flow priority not working Filip Janiszewski
• flow rule to drop all the packets Filip Janiszewski
  • Re: flow rule to drop all the packets Filip Janiszewski
• Building DPDK with Meson/Ninja using ICC Leonid Bloch
  • Re: Building DPDK with Meson/Ninja using ICC David Marchand
• Impact on DPDK application when using the multi-process feature? Staffan Wiklund
  • Re: Impact on DPDK application when using the multi-process feature? Stephen Hemminger
  • Re: Impact on DPDK application when using the multi-process feature? Staffan Wiklund
• Question about supported GPU cards for DPDK [email protected]
  • Re: Question about supported GPU cards for DPDK Cliff Burdick
  • RE: Question about supported GPU cards for DPDK [email protected]
• hierarchical QoS traffic class and queue association problem waqas ahmed
• Find all matches with DPDK ACL Дмитрий Степанов
  • Re: Find all matches with DPDK ACL Steffen Weise
  • Re: Find all matches with DPDK ACL Dmitry Kozlyuk
  • Re: Find all matches with DPDK ACL Дмитрий Степанов
  • Re: Find all matches with DPDK ACL Dmitry Kozlyuk
  • Re: Find all matches with DPDK ACL Дмитрий Степанов
  • Re: Find all matches with DPDK ACL Dmitry Kozlyuk
• RSS queue problem with i40e on DPDK 20.11.3 Antti-Pekka Liedes
  • Re: RSS queue problem with i40e on DPDK 20.11.3 Eric Christian
  • Re: RSS queue problem with i40e on DPDK 20.11.3 Antti-Pekka Liedes
• a problem 李嘉宾
• KNI and mbuf pool with external memory David Schramm
• Accessing TLS for EAL threads Antonio Di Bacco
  • Re: Accessing TLS for EAL threads Pavel Vazharov
  • Re: Accessing TLS for EAL threads Stephen Hemminger
• Can the DPDK multi-process feature be used in Docker containers? Staffan Wiklund
  • Re: Can the DPDK multi-process feature be used in Docker containers? Cliff Burdick
  • Re: Can the DPDK multi-process feature be used in Docker containers? Li Feng
  • Re: Can the DPDK multi-process feature be used in Docker containers? Cliff Burdick
  • Re: Can the DPDK multi-process feature be used in Docker containers? Li Feng
  • Re: Can the DPDK multi-process feature be used in Docker containers? Staffan Wiklund
  • Re: Can the DPDK multi-process feature be used in Docker containers? Cliff Burdick
• Accessing EAL threads TLS Antonio Di Bacco
• RE: mlx5 VF packet lost between rx_port_unicast_packets and rx_good_packets Francesco Montorsi
  • RE: mlx5 VF packet lost between rx_port_unicast_packets and rx_good_packets Francesco Montorsi
• release schedule change proposal Thomas Monjalon
  • Re: release schedule change proposal Luca Boccassi
  • Re: release schedule change proposal Jerin Jacob
  • Re: release schedule change proposal Kevin Traynor
  • Re: release schedule change proposal Ilya Maximets
  • Re: release schedule change proposal Flavio Leitner
  • Re: release schedule change proposal Stephen Hemminger
  • Re: release schedule change proposal Shepard Siegel
  • Re: release schedule change proposal Ajit Khaparde
• Pdump Didn't capture the packet 廖書華
  • RE: Pdump Didn't capture the packet Pattan, Reshma
  • Re: Pdump Didn't capture the packet 廖書華
  • RE: Pdump Didn't capture the packet Pattan, Reshma
  • Re: Pdump Didn't capture the packet 廖書華
  • Re: Pdump Didn't capture the packet Stephen Hemminger
• rte_flow MARK + JUMP with mlx5 Daniel Romell
  • Re: rte_flow MARK + JUMP with mlx5 Tom Barbette
  • Re: rte_flow MARK + JUMP with mlx5 Daniel Romell
  • Re: rte_flow MARK + JUMP with mlx5 Daniel Romell
  • Re: rte_flow MARK + JUMP with mlx5 Daniel Romell
• How to limit testpmd packet generation rate when forward-mode=txonly Francesco
  • Re: How to limit testpmd packet generation rate when forward-mode=txonly Stephen Hemminger
• DPDK basic configuration questions Michael Mason
• [test-bbdev] Custom test-vector Ginés García Avilés
  • RE: [test-bbdev] Custom test-vector Chautru, Nicolas
  • Re: [test-bbdev] Custom test-vector Ginés García Avilés
  • RE: [test-bbdev] Custom test-vector Chautru, Nicolas
  • Re: [test-bbdev] Custom test-vector Ginés García Avilés
• RSS Hash suport in DPDK on Amazon ENA NICs broken? fwefew 4t4tg
  • Re: [dpdk-dev] RSS Hash suport in DPDK on Amazon ENA NICs broken? Michał Krawczyk
• Difficulty with legacy mem mode DPDK 20.11 MOD
• Unable to allocate rte_eth_dev on "create boude" nats
• Doubt regarding DPDK hash Library implementation Syam Prasad N Pearson
  • Re: [dpdk-dev] Doubt regarding DPDK hash Library implementation Thomas Monjalon
  • RE: [dpdk-dev] Doubt regarding DPDK hash Library implementation Kinsella, Ray
  • Re: [dpdk-dev] Doubt regarding DPDK hash Library implementation Medvedkin, Vladimir
  • Re: [dpdk-dev] Doubt regarding DPDK hash Library implementation Thomas Monjalon
  • Re: [dpdk-dev] Doubt regarding DPDK hash Library implementation Syam Prasad N Pearson
• [dpdk-users] net_af_xdp start failed with can't get next link Hong Christian
  • RE: [dpdk-users] net_af_xdp start failed with can't get next link Loftus, Ciara
• [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-users] is i40evf support promisc? // DPDK 20.11 - i40evf: No response for 14 liaobiting
  • Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-users] is i40evf support promisc? // DPDK 20.11 - i40evf: No response for 14 David Christensen
  • re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-users] is i40evf support promisc? // DPDK 20.11 - i40evf: No response for 14 liaobiting
• Please help to see this DPDK problem//Reply: DPDK 20.11 - i40evf: No response for 14 liaobiting
• Are KNI RX/TX burst API thread safe? 陳健新
• Multiple processes communicating via DPDK memif PMD? Staffan Wiklund
• pmd_af_xdp: does net_af_xdp support different rx/tx queue configuration Hong Christian
  • RE: pmd_af_xdp: does net_af_xdp support different rx/tx queue configuration Loftus, Ciara
  • 回复: pmd_af_xdp: does net_af_xdp support different rx/tx queue configuration Hong Christian
  • RE: pmd_af_xdp: does net_af_xdp support different rx/tx queue configuration Loftus, Ciara
  • 回复: pmd_af_xdp: does net_af_xdp support different rx/tx queue configuration Hong Christian
• Aboud DPDK Multi-Process 赖香武
  • Re: Aboud DPDK Multi-Process David Marchand
  • RE: Aboud DPDK Multi-Process Burakov, Anatoly
  • Re:RE: Aboud DPDK Multi-Process 赖香武
  • RE: Re:RE: Aboud DPDK Multi-Process Burakov, Anatoly
  • Re:RE: Re:RE: Aboud DPDK Multi-Process 赖香武
  • RE: Re:RE: Re:RE: Aboud DPDK Multi-Process Richardson, Bruce
  • Re:RE: Re:RE: Re:RE: Aboud DPDK Multi-Process 赖香武
  • RE: Re:RE: Re:RE: Re:RE: Aboud DPDK Multi-Process Richardson, Bruce
• If or how one gets an IP address associated with a vfio-pci bound NIC fwefew 4t4tg
  • Re: If or how one gets an IP address associated with a vfio-pci bound NIC David Christensen
  • Re: If or how one gets an IP address associated with a vfio-pci bound NIC fwefew 4t4tg
  • Re: If or how one gets an IP address associated with a vfio-pci bound NIC David Christensen
• DPDK support for UDP RPCs with congestion handle, packet loss fwefew 4t4tg
• dpdk-pktgen: jumbo frames on AWS EC2 Knight, Joshua
• Enable RX interrupts Jack Humphries
  • Re: Enable RX interrupts Dmitry Kozlyuk
  • Re: Enable RX interrupts Jack Humphries
  • Re: Enable RX interrupts Thomas Monjalon
  • Re: Enable RX interrupts Stephen Hemminger
  • Re: Enable RX interrupts Jack Humphries
  • Re: Enable RX interrupts Stephen Hemminger
• Error while compiling dpdk 21.08 for arm64 animesh tripathi
  • Re: Error while compiling dpdk 21.08 for arm64 David Marchand
• questions about rxonly mode in testpmd 尹斌
• DPDK 21.08 build failure with meson 0.60.0 Nigel Kukard
  • Re: DPDK 21.08 build failure with meson 0.60.0 Tom Barbette
  • Re: DPDK 21.08 build failure with meson 0.60.0 David Marchand
• DPDK 20.11 - i40evf: No response for 14 liaobiting
• [dpdk-users] EAL: failed to parse device Hakan Doğan
  • Re: [dpdk-users] EAL: failed to parse device Dmitry Kozlyuk
• [dpdk-users] DPDK VF rte_flow invalid - Cannot create flow on VF my Zhu
• Problems with APP linking with DPDK 21.08 ... LIBRTE_NET_BOND Nishant Verma
  • Re: Problems with APP linking with DPDK 21.08 ... LIBRTE_NET_BOND Nishant Verma
• question about dpdk-oriented applications with X722 in i40e driver 尹斌

• Earlier messages
• Later messages