On 11/22/2013 21:28, Venkatesh Srinivas wrote: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:18 AM, John Marino <[email protected]> wrote: >> ah, another one: semaphores >> >> >> I'm starting to hit problems due to semaphores not being implemented on >> DragonFly, so let's call this #11 > > I posted an implementation of sem_open / sem_close / sem_unlink() some > time ago, that was not-strictly-POSIX-compliant, but was sufficient > for Python's multiprocessing module to work; that may be worth > resurrecting? >
It's worth a look, where did you post it? What would it take to bring it up POSIX compliance? (Sorry, I missed the post earlier). John
