On 24 Jul 2015, at 17:04, Ian Hinder <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 24 Jul 2015, at 16:59, Ian Hinder <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 24 Jul 2015, at 14:13, Erik Schnetter <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I just pushed all the changes related to the McLachlan-rewrite merge. Apart
>>> from the McLachlan Kranc scripts and the respective generated code, there
>>> are a few thorns that needed to have test results updated.
>>>
>>> I see zero test failures with these changes on Bethe, Blue Waters, Carver,
>>> Datura, Edison, Hopper, Mike, Nvidia (a Perimeter workstation), Philip,
>>> Queen Bee, Shelob, and Stampede.
>>
>> Hi Erik,
>>
>> It looks like there are some issues with backward compatibility. I get this
>> error:
>>
>> WARNING[L2,P0] (Cactus): ParameterSetKeyword: Unable to set keyword
>> 'ML_BSSN::my_rhs_boundary_condition', new value 'static' is not in any
>> active range
>> WARNING[L1,P0] (Cactus): Major error in parameter file
>> '/lustre/datura/ianhin/simulations/einsteintoolkit/rewrite_ML_BSSN_bench_o4/output-0000/ML_BSSN_bench.par'
>> line 30: Range error setting parameter 'ML_BSSN::my_rhs_boundary_condition'
>> to 'static'
>
> Also, any output parameters referring to the old variables are now invalid;
> e.g. phi has been renamed phiW. Given this, it looks like old parameter
> files will very likely all have to be modified for the new version.
Hi Erik,
Something is wrong with the merge: the merge commit should have two parents,
but it only has one.
https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/mclachlan/commits/all
It looks like the "merge" is just a set of changes on the master branch.
--
Ian Hinder
http://members.aei.mpg.de/ianhin
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
