On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Ian Hinder <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 24 Jul 2015, at 14:13, Erik Schnetter <[email protected]> wrote: > > I just pushed all the changes related to the McLachlan-rewrite merge. > Apart from the McLachlan Kranc scripts and the respective generated code, > there are a few thorns that needed to have test results updated. > > I see zero test failures with these changes on Bethe, Blue Waters, Carver, > Datura, Edison, Hopper, Mike, Nvidia (a Perimeter workstation), Philip, > Queen Bee, Shelob, and Stampede. > > > Hi Erik, > > It looks like there are some issues with backward compatibility. I get > this error: > > WARNING[L2,P0] (Cactus): ParameterSetKeyword: Unable to set > keyword 'ML_BSSN::my_rhs_boundary_condition', new value 'static' is not in > any active range > WARNING[L1,P0] (Cactus): Major error in parameter > file > '/lustre/datura/ianhin/simulations/einsteintoolkit/rewrite_ML_BSSN_bench_o4/output-0000/ML_BSSN_bench.par' > line > 30: Range error setting parameter 'ML_BSSN::my_rhs_boundary_condition' to > 'static' > Ian I think you can use "scalar" instead, which sets the RHS to zero. We can add a compatibility layer for this. -erik -- Erik Schnetter <[email protected]> http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/personal/eschnetter/
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
