Hi Tom,
I fear, the code didn't make :-) You may send it to me directly. Thanks
Regards
On 6/29/07, Tom Remoleur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, I think this short exemple illustrate my problem, If we want more,
just tell me.
The result is :
Time: 0.143
There was 1 failure:
1)
testBug(fr.u_strasbg.clarinet.stork.test.deviceconfig.ca.TestBugCA
)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError:
expected:<1000> but was:<500>
at
fr.u_strasbg.clarinet.stork.test.deviceconfig.ca.TestBugCA.testBug(
TestBugCA.java:67)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java
:39)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at
fr.u_strasbg.clarinet.stork.test.TestActivator.start(TestActivator.java
:27)
at
org.apache.felix.framework.util.SecureAction.startActivator(
SecureAction.java:589)
at org.apache.felix.framework.Felix._startBundle(Felix.java:1309)
at org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.startBundle(Felix.java:1243)
at org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.setFrameworkStartLevel(
Felix.java:838)
at org.apache.felix.framework.StartLevelImpl.run(
StartLevelImpl.java:256)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
FAILURES!!!
Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0
Thanks
Tom Remoleur
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 17:13:20 +0200, Felix Meschberger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> This would certainly not be a feature but a bug. But since
> Configuration.update immediately stores a configuration object, such
that
> persistene and internal cache have the same state, this is unexpected.
>
> Can you provide me with a short test case to reproduce the issue ? Thank
> you
> very much.
>
> Regards
> Felix
>
> On 6/29/07, Tom Remoleur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've got a problem with the Felix configuration admin service :
>> For accessing to configuration I'm both using the configuration admin
>> "getConfiguration" and "listConfiguration" methods, but if I update a
>> configuration using first the "listConfiguration" method and after I
>> access to the same conf using the "getConfiguration" method, it's
return
>> me the old configuration without the previous update modifications.
>> I've debugged my application and I've noticed the "listConfiguration"
>> command read the configuration from the persistant store by the
>> "getConfiguration" retrieve them from a cache but when a configuration
>> getted by "listConfiguration" is updated the cached configuration isn't
>> updated.
>>
>> Is it a feature or a bug ?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Tom Remoleur
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
