Hi Tom,

I created and fixed FELIX-317 [1] for this issue. I also deployed a new
snapshot build to the Apache Snapshot repository.

Can you please confirm whether this fixes your issues ? Thanks.

Regards
Felix

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-317


Am Freitag, den 29.06.2007, 18:04 +0200 schrieb Tom Remoleur:
> Ok, I think this short exemple illustrate my problem, If we want more,  
> just tell me.
> 
> The result is :
> 
> Time: 0.143
> There was 1 failure:
> 1)  
> testBug(fr.u_strasbg.clarinet.stork.test.deviceconfig.ca.TestBugCA)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError:
>   
> expected:<1000> but was:<500>
>       at  
> fr.u_strasbg.clarinet.stork.test.deviceconfig.ca.TestBugCA.testBug(TestBugCA.java:67)
>       at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>       at  
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>       at  
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>       at  
> fr.u_strasbg.clarinet.stork.test.TestActivator.start(TestActivator.java:27)
>       at  
> org.apache.felix.framework.util.SecureAction.startActivator(SecureAction.java:589)
>       at org.apache.felix.framework.Felix._startBundle(Felix.java:1309)
>       at org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.startBundle(Felix.java:1243)
>       at 
> org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.setFrameworkStartLevel(Felix.java:838)
>       at 
> org.apache.felix.framework.StartLevelImpl.run(StartLevelImpl.java:256)
>       at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
> 
> FAILURES!!!
> Tests run: 1,  Failures: 1,  Errors: 0
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Tom Remoleur
> 
> On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 17:13:20 +0200, Felix Meschberger  
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > This would certainly not be a feature but a bug. But since
> > Configuration.update immediately stores a configuration object, such that
> > persistene and internal cache have the same state, this is unexpected.
> >
> > Can you provide me with a short test case to reproduce the issue ? Thank  
> > you
> > very much.
> >
> > Regards
> > Felix
> >
> > On 6/29/07, Tom Remoleur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I've got a problem with the Felix configuration admin service :
> >> For accessing to configuration I'm both using the configuration admin
> >> "getConfiguration" and "listConfiguration" methods, but if I update a
> >> configuration using first the "listConfiguration" method and after I
> >> access to the same conf using the "getConfiguration" method, it's return
> >> me the old configuration without the previous update modifications.
> >> I've debugged my application and I've noticed the "listConfiguration"
> >> command read the configuration from the persistant store by the
> >> "getConfiguration" retrieve them from a cache but when a configuration
> >> getted by "listConfiguration" is updated the cached configuration isn't
> >> updated.
> >>
> >> Is it a feature or a bug ?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Tom Remoleur
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to