ok thanks a lot.

Asma

--- En date de : Mar 19.5.09, Francesco Furfari <[email protected]> 
a écrit :

De: Francesco Furfari <[email protected]>
Objet: Re: UPnP Port
À: [email protected]
Date: Mardi 19 Mai 2009, 16h44

Yes, I looked at the code, and I can confirm that we use the first 
available port. The original code from from Cyberlink used a fixed port.
We changed this behavior to run multiple instances of the OSGi framework.

If you want to change it you can modify the code @ line 113 of the 
org.cybergarage.upnp.ControlPoint:

    private final static int DEFAULT_SSDP_PORT = 0;


By inspecting the pom you get the domoware repository
http://domoware.isti.cnr.it/maven2/it/cnr/isti/domoware/cyberdomo/upnp-stack/1.8.0/

francesco



chihi asma wrote:
> Thanks. but I have an other question. I see that the basedriver import in its 
> code the org.cybergarage and I dont know from where the basedriver get this 
> library? I don't have it?
> thanks in advance
> 
> 
> --- En date de : Mar 19.5.09, Francesco Furfari 
> <[email protected]> a écrit :
> 
> De: Francesco Furfari <[email protected]>
> Objet: Re: UPnP Port
> À: [email protected]
> Date: Mardi 19 Mai 2009, 16h14
> 
> the right way to reply is by getting the source address of the received 
> M-Search message , I guess the basedriver uses the first available port 
> to send the request, I don't remember now.
> 
> francesco
> 
> 
> chihi asma wrote:
>> thanks Francesco I understand this, but I know that to respond to control 
>> point M-Search, devices should send an unicast ssdp message. I want to know 
>> to which port?
>> Does the basedrievr specify any port? 
>> --- En date de : Mar 19.5.09, Francesco Furfari 
>> <[email protected]> a écrit :
>>
>> De: Francesco Furfari <[email protected]>
>> Objet: Re: UPnP Port
>> À: [email protected]
>> Date: Mardi 19 Mai 2009, 15h46
>>
>> Hi Asma,
>>
>> if your question is:
>> Can UPnP devices coexist on the same host machine? one developed by using 
>> Felix Base driver and another one (the mentioned Mediaserver) developed by 
>> third party?
>>
>> The answer is yes, the port is not a problem.
>> It is a port used by all the devices belonging to the same multicast group. 
>> You don't need to change the port for the devices running on the OSGi 
>> Platform.
>>
>> ------
>>
>> If you have experienced a conflict then there is a bug.
>>
>>
>> francesco
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> chihi asma wrote:
>>> I understand that the 1900 port is a standard port on which listens UPnP 
>>> devices and control points, but on which source port sends the basedriver 
>>> the ssdp requests? I can't find it in the source code of the basedriver. 
>>> Please help me
>>>
>>> Asma
>>>
>>> --- En date de : Mar 19.5.09, Stefano Lenzi <[email protected]> a écrit :
>>>
>>> De: Stefano Lenzi <[email protected]>
>>> Objet: Re: UPnP Port
>>> À: [email protected]
>>> Date: Mardi 19 Mai 2009, 14h43
>>>
>>> chihi asma wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I'm runing the UPnP basedriver in an embedded device to detect UPnP 
>>>> services on the network and as it is shown in the upnp.properties file the 
>>>> default ssdp port is 1900 but I'm also runing a media server which listens 
>>>> on the same port. So I get a conflict. May I change the basedriver port 
>>>> without having any problem?
>>> If change the listing port you are creating UPnP network that can't 
>>> discover each other, unless you want to "join" the network on the OSGi 
>>> platform.  Is it clear?
>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>          
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>        
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 
> 
> 
> 
>       

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]




      

Reply via email to