sana wrote:
i tried to run the base driver with a Media server already running and i get this error:at gnu.java.net.VMPlainSocketImpl.bind(Native Method) at gnu.java.net.VMPlainSocketImpl.bind(VMPlainSocketImpl.java:302) at gnu.java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl.bind(PlainDatagramSocketImpl.java:125)
Can you send us also the begining of the exception messages? On which JVM are you executing the OSGi platform?
at java.net.DatagramSocket.bind(DatagramSocket.java:700) at java.net.MulticastSocket.<init>(MulticastSocket.java:112) at java.net.MulticastSocket.<init>(MulticastSocket.java:93) at org.cybergarage.upnp.ssdp.HTTPMUSocket.open(HTTPMUSocket.java:133) at org.cybergarage.upnp.ssdp.HTTPMUSocket.open(HTTPMUSocket.java:147) at org.cybergarage.upnp.ssdp.SSDPNotifySocket.<init>(SSDPNotifySocket.java:52) at org.cybergarage.upnp.ssdp.SSDPNotifySocketList.open(SSDPNotifySocketList.java:89) at org.cybergarage.upnp.ControlPoint.start(ControlPoint.java:852) at org.cybergarage.upnp.ControlPoint.start(ControlPoint.java:905) at org.apache.felix.upnp.basedriver.Activator.doInitImporter(Activator.java:239) at org.apache.felix.upnp.basedriver.Activator.start(Activator.java:87) at org.knopflerfish.framework.BundleImpl.start0(BundleImpl.java:373) at org.knopflerfish.framework.PermissionOps.callStart0(PermissionOps.java:212) at org.knopflerfish.framework.BundleImpl.start(BundleImpl.java:320) at org.knopflerfish.framework.StartLevelImpl.increaseStartLevel(StartLevelImpl.java:278) at org.knopflerfish.framework.StartLevelImpl$1.run(StartLevelImpl.java:210) at org.knopflerfish.framework.StartLevelImpl.run(StartLevelImpl.java:171) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:743) [stdout] ## DEBUG: errors - FrameworkErrorEvent bundle #751 [stdout] ## DEBUG: errors - FrameworkErrorEvent throwable: org.osgi.framework.BundleException: BundleActivator start failed at org.knopflerfish.framework.BundleImpl.start0(BundleImpl.java:418) at org.knopflerfish.framework.PermissionOps.callStart0(PermissionOps.java:212) at org.knopflerfish.framework.BundleImpl.start(BundleImpl.java:320) at org.knopflerfish.framework.StartLevelImpl.increaseStartLevel(StartLevelImpl.java:278) at org.knopflerfish.framework.StartLevelImpl$1.run(StartLevelImpl.java:210) at org.knopflerfish.framework.StartLevelImpl.run(StartLevelImpl.java:171) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:743) Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException at org.cybergarage.upnp.ssdp.HTTPMUSocket.getLocalPort(HTTPMUSocket.java:95) at org.cybergarage.upnp.ssdp.SSDPNotifySocket.start(SSDPNotifySocket.java:122) at org.cybergarage.upnp.ssdp.SSDPNotifySocketList.start(SSDPNotifySocketList.java:115) at org.cybergarage.upnp.ControlPoint.start(ControlPoint.java:855) at org.cybergarage.upnp.ControlPoint.start(ControlPoint.java:905) at org.apache.felix.upnp.basedriver.Activator.doInitImporter(Activator.java:239) at org.apache.felix.upnp.basedriver.Activator.start(Activator.java:87) at org.knopflerfish.framework.BundleImpl.start0(BundleImpl.java:373) ...6 more [stdout] Nested bundle exception: java.lang.NullPointerException at org.cybergarage.upnp.ssdp.HTTPMUSocket.getLocalPort(HTTPMUSocket.java:95) at org.cybergarage.upnp.ssdp.SSDPNotifySocket.start(SSDPNotifySocket.java:122) at org.cybergarage.upnp.ssdp.SSDPNotifySocketList.start(SSDPNotifySocketList.java:115) at org.cybergarage.upnp.ControlPoint.start(ControlPoint.java:855) at org.cybergarage.upnp.ControlPoint.start(ControlPoint.java:905) at org.apache.felix.upnp.basedriver.Activator.doInitImporter(Activator.java:239) at org.apache.felix.upnp.basedriver.Activator.start(Activator.java:87) at org.knopflerfish.framework.BundleImpl.start0(BundleImpl.java:373) at org.knopflerfish.framework.PermissionOps.callStart0(PermissionOps.java:212) at org.knopflerfish.framework.BundleImpl.start(BundleImpl.java:320) at org.knopflerfish.framework.StartLevelImpl.increaseStartLevel(StartLevelImpl.java:278) at org.knopflerfish.framework.StartLevelImpl$1.run(StartLevelImpl.java:210) at org.knopflerfish.framework.StartLevelImpl.run(StartLevelImpl.java:171) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:743) how can you explain that Sana, 2009/5/19 chihi asma <[email protected]>ok thanks a lot. Asma --- En date de : Mar 19.5.09, Francesco Furfari < [email protected]> a écrit : De: Francesco Furfari <[email protected]> Objet: Re: UPnP Port À: [email protected] Date: Mardi 19 Mai 2009, 16h44 Yes, I looked at the code, and I can confirm that we use the first available port. The original code from from Cyberlink used a fixed port. We changed this behavior to run multiple instances of the OSGi framework. If you want to change it you can modify the code @ line 113 of the org.cybergarage.upnp.ControlPoint: private final static int DEFAULT_SSDP_PORT = 0; By inspecting the pom you get the domoware repository http://domoware.isti.cnr.it/maven2/it/cnr/isti/domoware/cyberdomo/upnp-stack/1.8.0/ francesco chihi asma wrote:Thanks. but I have an other question. I see that the basedriver import inits code the org.cybergarage and I dont know from where the basedriver get this library? I don't have it?thanks in advance --- En date de : Mar 19.5.09, Francesco Furfari <[email protected]> a écrit :De: Francesco Furfari <[email protected]> Objet: Re: UPnP Port À: [email protected] Date: Mardi 19 Mai 2009, 16h14 the right way to reply is by getting the source address of the received M-Search message , I guess the basedriver uses the first available port to send the request, I don't remember now. francesco chihi asma wrote:thanks Francesco I understand this, but I know that to respond tocontrol point M-Search, devices should send an unicast ssdp message. I want to know to which port?Does the basedrievr specify any port? --- En date de : Mar 19.5.09, Francesco Furfari <[email protected]> a écrit :De: Francesco Furfari <[email protected]> Objet: Re: UPnP Port À: [email protected] Date: Mardi 19 Mai 2009, 15h46 Hi Asma, if your question is: Can UPnP devices coexist on the same host machine? one developed byusing Felix Base driver and another one (the mentioned Mediaserver) developed by third party?The answer is yes, the port is not a problem. It is a port used by all the devices belonging to the same multicastgroup. You don't need to change the port for the devices running on the OSGi Platform.------ If you have experienced a conflict then there is a bug. francesco chihi asma wrote:I understand that the 1900 port is a standard port on which listensUPnP devices and control points, but on which source port sends the basedriver the ssdp requests? I can't find it in the source code of the basedriver. Please help meAsma --- En date de : Mar 19.5.09, Stefano Lenzi <[email protected]> aécrit :De: Stefano Lenzi <[email protected]> Objet: Re: UPnP Port À: [email protected] Date: Mardi 19 Mai 2009, 14h43 chihi asma wrote:Hi, I'm runing the UPnP basedriver in an embedded device to detect UPnPservices on the network and as it is shown in the upnp.properties file the default ssdp port is 1900 but I'm also runing a media server which listens on the same port. So I get a conflict. May I change the basedriver port without having any problem?If change the listing port you are creating UPnP network that can'tdiscover each other, unless you want to "join" the network on the OSGi platform. Is it clear?Thanks in advance--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
