On Mar 31, 2010, at 11:02 , Ivanhoe Abrahams wrote: > This is helpful in getting me pointing in the right direction. > So just to recap. > > Option 1 in your email is the traditional approach where you have aop > pointcuts, etc. defined > Option 2 is intercepting the calls and dynamically weaves in > code...something akin to asm bytecode weaving?
It does not do bytecode weaving at all, it relies on the fact that services have a service ranking, so the aspect simply publishes a service with all the same properties as the original one, but a higher ranking. Clients will automatically pick the service with the highest ranking. So there's no bytecode weaving at all (which makes debugging a lot easier, since your code still looks exactly like you wrote it). Greetings, Marcel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
