I think the current @Component annotation is correct :) (sorry) If you use factory="..." you will create a component factory as defined in the DS specification - that's in contrast to a component managed by factory configurations (which this example is about).
If you managed to get the Map of properties (which should work with the Map.Entry change I posted recently), then the full PID of the configuration is stored in a property named "service.pid" - you can then search for the tilde in there and get what you want. Regards Carsten Cristiano Gavião wrote > > > On 06/08/2018 11:10, Philipp Höfler wrote: >> Sorry, pid is probably the wrong word for that. Alias might be more >> correct. >> I am talking about the name after the ~ in the configuration file >> (my.config~system1). >> In this case I would like to get "system1". > > Ah, now I understood. > > I think you won't get that since your component is not a factory. If > I'm remember right, you need to use a FPID (factory pid), so your > component must be declared this way:*@Component(factory="anFactoryPID")* > > Couple years ago, I used to use the ConfigAdmin directly to activate my > mult-instance components and the information you want was only provided > by the Configuration object returned from CM: > >> configuration = getConfigurationAdmin() >> .createFactoryConfiguration(pFactoryPid, null); >> factoryPID = configuration.getFactoryPid(); >> pid = configuration.getPid() > > I just started with Configurator too, but I don't know if this FPID and > PID information are being published in the configuration map currently > also. CM used not do that until R6 (at least I was not able to find them). > > -- Carsten Ziegeler Adobe Research Switzerland cziege...@apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@felix.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@felix.apache.org
