I think the current @Component annotation is correct :) (sorry)

If you use factory="..." you will create a component factory as defined
in the DS specification - that's in contrast to a component managed by
factory configurations (which this example is about).

If you managed to get the Map of properties (which should work with the
Map.Entry change I posted recently), then the full PID of the
configuration is stored in a property named "service.pid" - you can then
search for the tilde in there and get what you want.



Cristiano Gavião wrote
> On 06/08/2018 11:10, Philipp Höfler wrote:
>> Sorry, pid is probably the wrong word for that. Alias might be more
>> correct.
>> I am talking about the name after the ~ in the configuration file
>> (my.config~system1).
>> In this case I would like to get "system1".
> Ah, now I understood.
> I think you won't get that since your component is not a factory.  If
> I'm remember right, you need to use a FPID (factory pid), so your
> component must be declared this way:*@Component(factory="anFactoryPID")*
> Couple years ago, I used to use the ConfigAdmin directly to activate my
> mult-instance components and the information you want was only provided
> by the Configuration object returned from CM:
>> configuration = getConfigurationAdmin()
>>                     .createFactoryConfiguration(pFactoryPid, null);
>> factoryPID = configuration.getFactoryPid();
>> pid = configuration.getPid()
> I just started with Configurator too, but I don't know if this FPID and
> PID information are being published in the configuration map currently
> also. CM used not do that until R6 (at least I was not able to find them).
Carsten Ziegeler
Adobe Research Switzerland

To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@felix.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@felix.apache.org

Reply via email to