If you are talking about  minWidth="0" and multiline="true" then sorry it
does not work.


On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 2:07 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Perhaps this answer would help?
>
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3152292/flex-4-richeditabletext-word-wrap
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 12:05 PM, mark goldin <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Well, it's not wrapping. But as soon as I resize the column the text gets
> > wrapped.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > You may need to set the width to the width of the column.
> > >
> > > On 7/12/13 11:29 AM, "mark goldin" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > >Yeah, that's what I am getting into. But I am having a problem with
> > > >using RichEditableText.
> > > >I want to change its height to make a datagird more compact. But as
> soon
> > > >as
> > > >I change the height I am losing word wrapping.
> > > >The only time the word wrapping is working is when a height is set to
> > > >100%.
> > > >But then DG has very large rows.
> > > >Any idea?
> > > >
> > > >Thanks
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Someone recently pointed out that the minimum text widget that shows
> > > >> selection is RichEditableText which is relatively heavy.  I think
> > you'll
> > > >> have to start there.
> > > >>
> > > >> On 7/12/13 11:18 AM, "mark goldin" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> >Spark
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Alex Harui <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >> Spark or MX DataGrid?
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> On 7/12/13 8:47 AM, "mark goldin" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> >I have a datagrid where in one of columns I need to be able to
> > > >>search
> > > >> >>and
> > > >> >> >highlight instances of text. What is the best item renderer for
> > that
> > > >> >>might
> > > >> >> >be?
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> >Thanks
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to