But if I need to specify height what do I do?
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote: > Try not using % widths. Use left,top,right,bottom as needed. > > On 7/12/13 1:24 PM, "mark goldin" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Simplified a bit: > ><?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> > ><s:GridItemRenderer xmlns:fx="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009"; > > xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark" > > xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx" > > xmlns:gridEditorClasses="spark.components.gridEditorClasses.*" > > xmlns:ns="library://commons.stoneriver.com" > > > > > <fx:Script> > ><![CDATA[ > >override public function prepare(hasBeenRecycled:Boolean):void > >{ > >super.prepare(hasBeenRecycled); > >if (data) > >{ > >Question.height = 48; > >Question.width = column.width; > >} > >else > >{ > >Question.height = 24; > >} > >} > >} > >]]> > ></fx:Script> > > <!--- The renderer's visual component. --> > ><s:VGroup width="100%" gap="0"> > ><s:RichEditableText id="Question" verticalAlign="top" height="100%" > >paddingTop="10" paddingBottom="10" width="100%" > >editable="false" unfocusedTextSelectionColor="red" minWidth="0" > >multiline="true" > >fontSize="{column.grid.dataGrid.getStyle('fontSize')}" paddingLeft="10" > >selectionHighlighting="always"/> > ></s:VGroup> > ></s:GridItemRenderer> > > > > > > > >On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Smells like some other code is setting percentWidth to 100. Can you > >>post > >> a small test case? Or at least the full renderer? > >> > >> On 7/12/13 12:18 PM, "mark goldin" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> >Basically, something like this: > >> >override public function prepare(hasBeenRecycled:Boolean):void > >> >{ > >> >super.prepare(hasBeenRecycled); > >> >if (data) > >> >{ > >> >Question.width = column.width; > >> >} > >> >} > >> >where Question is RichEditableText. > >> > > >> > > >> >On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> >> How are you setting the width? I suspect that when the column gets > >> >> resized the width gets set. > >> >> > >> >> On 7/12/13 12:05 PM, "mark goldin" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> >Well, it's not wrapping. But as soon as I resize the column the text > >> >>gets > >> >> >wrapped. > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Alex Harui <[email protected]> > >>wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >> You may need to set the width to the width of the column. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On 7/12/13 11:29 AM, "mark goldin" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >Yeah, that's what I am getting into. But I am having a problem > >>with > >> >> >> >using RichEditableText. > >> >> >> >I want to change its height to make a datagird more compact. But > >>as > >> >> >>soon > >> >> >> >as > >> >> >> >I change the height I am losing word wrapping. > >> >> >> >The only time the word wrapping is working is when a height is > >>set > >> >>to > >> >> >> >100%. > >> >> >> >But then DG has very large rows. > >> >> >> >Any idea? > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >Thanks > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Alex Harui <[email protected]> > >> >>wrote: > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> Someone recently pointed out that the minimum text widget that > >> >>shows > >> >> >> >> selection is RichEditableText which is relatively heavy. I > >>think > >> >> >>you'll > >> >> >> >> have to start there. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> On 7/12/13 11:18 AM, "mark goldin" <[email protected]> > >>wrote: > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >Spark > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Alex Harui <[email protected] > > > >> >> >>wrote: > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> Spark or MX DataGrid? > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> On 7/12/13 8:47 AM, "mark goldin" <[email protected]> > >> >>wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >I have a datagrid where in one of columns I need to be > >>able to > >> >> >> >>search > >> >> >> >> >>and > >> >> >> >> >> >highlight instances of text. What is the best item renderer > >> >>for > >> >> >>that > >> >> >> >> >>might > >> >> >> >> >> >be? > >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> >Thanks > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > >
