>Could be money too.

AFAIK, Double precision float is 52bit, that is around 15 decimal digits, which 
is more than enough for even largest financial figures, as long as you don't do 
too many computations in Flex (because of rounding errors accumulation).
My company's customers are some of the largest banks , and the figures are 
never that huge, even with cents precision...

Then there is the "storage" case.  I agree that PetaBytes (10^15) would push to 
the maximums. Hopefully, it's not that common.

Maurice 

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Alex Harui [mailto:[email protected]] 
Envoyé : vendredi 17 janvier 2014 18:32
À : [email protected]
Objet : Re: Number Formatter Query

Could be money too.  I've been told that financial apps need this.

Or storage. I think petabytes push the maximums.

At some point in time, Flex will probably need a good library for this.

On 1/17/14 8:51 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" <[email protected]> wrote:

>What could be the real-life use case for such huge figures ?   is it a
>physics or math  application?
>
>Maurice
>
>-----Message d'origine-----
>De : Virat Patil [mailto:[email protected]] Envoyé : jeudi 16 
>janvier 2014 12:26 À : [email protected] Objet : RE: Number 
>Formatter Query
>
>Sorry . kindly ignore previous test code.
>
>Test Code
>var value:String="14999999999999999188.00";
>var formatter:NumberFormatter=new NumberFormatter(); value 
>=formatter.format(value); trace(value);
>
>After trace the value i get is this "15,000,000,000,000,000,000"
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Virat Patil
>Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 4:39 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Number Formatter Query
>
>Hello
>
>I am trying to format value using number formatter.
>
>This is my test Code
>var value:int="14999999999999999188.00";
>var formatter:NumberFormatter=new NumberFormatter(); value 
>=formatter.format(value); trace(value);
>                               
>After trace the value i get is this "15,000,000,000,000,000,000"
>
>It returns me above value. I think it is maximum number is there any 
>other way to so that I can get proper value.
>
>
>Regards
>Virat
>MASTEK LTD.
>In the US, we're called MAJESCOMASTEK
>
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>~~~
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual and not 
>that of Mastek Limited, unless specifically indicated to that effect.
>Mastek Limited does not accept any responsibility or liability for it.
>This e-mail and attachments (if any) transmitted with it are 
>confidential and/or privileged and solely for the use of the intended 
>person or entity to which it is addressed. Any review, re-transmission, 
>dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon 
>this information by persons or entities other than the intended 
>recipient is prohibited. This e-mail and its attachments have been 
>scanned for the presence of computer viruses. It is the responsibility 
>of the recipient to run the virus check on e-mails and attachments 
>before opening them. If you have received this e-mail in error, kindly delete 
>this e-mail from desktop and server.
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>~~~
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>

Reply via email to