You can also have a look at the ActionScript3 implementation of Long,
BigInteger and BigDecimal types in GraniteDS:
http://www.granitedataservices.com/public/docs/3.0.1/docs/reference/flex/graniteds-refguide-flex.html#graniteds.bignumbers


2014/1/20 Maurice Amsellem <[email protected]>

>
> Ok, that's the right approach (limiting character count)
> ______________________________________
> De : Virat Patil [[email protected]]
> Envoyé : lundi 20 janvier 2014 05:26
> À : [email protected]
> Objet : RE: Number Formatter Query
>
> Thanks for the reply
> This was kind of regression testing performed at our end by testers.
> We  have currently put limit over the number of characters entered.
>
> Regards
> Virat
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Harui [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2014 12:39 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Number Formatter Query
>
> Regarding money, you probably know better than I since you work directly
> with the banks, but I was recalling going to Bali many years ago where
> their 100,000 note was worth about USD2.  I wonder if their banks would hit
> the 10^15 maximum faster.
>
> I agree it isn't common, but if Flex is to truly allow you to code
> "anything", we will need to have libraries that handle big numbers and have
> "infinite precision" at least to the degree that Java does.
>
> On 1/17/14 10:15 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >>Could be money too.
> >
> >AFAIK, Double precision float is 52bit, that is around 15 decimal
> >digits, which is more than enough for even largest financial figures,
> >as long as you don't do too many computations in Flex (because of
> >rounding errors accumulation).
> >My company's customers are some of the largest banks , and the figures
> >are never that huge, even with cents precision...
> >
> >Then there is the "storage" case.  I agree that PetaBytes (10^15) would
> >push to the maximums. Hopefully, it's not that common.
> >
> >Maurice
> >
> >-----Message d'origine-----
> >De : Alex Harui [mailto:[email protected]] Envoyé : vendredi 17 janvier
> >2014 18:32 À : [email protected] Objet : Re: Number Formatter Query
> >
> >Could be money too.  I've been told that financial apps need this.
> >
> >Or storage. I think petabytes push the maximums.
> >
> >At some point in time, Flex will probably need a good library for this.
> >
> >On 1/17/14 8:51 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" <[email protected]>
> >wrote:
> >
> >>What could be the real-life use case for such huge figures ?   is it a
> >>physics or math  application?
> >>
> >>Maurice
> >>
> >>-----Message d'origine-----
> >>De : Virat Patil [mailto:[email protected]] Envoyé : jeudi 16
> >>janvier 2014 12:26 À : [email protected] Objet : RE: Number
> >>Formatter Query
> >>
> >>Sorry . kindly ignore previous test code.
> >>
> >>Test Code
> >>var value:String="14999999999999999188.00";
> >>var formatter:NumberFormatter=new NumberFormatter(); value
> >>=formatter.format(value); trace(value);
> >>
> >>After trace the value i get is this "15,000,000,000,000,000,000"
> >>
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Virat Patil
> >>Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 4:39 PM
> >>To: [email protected]
> >>Subject: Number Formatter Query
> >>
> >>Hello
> >>
> >>I am trying to format value using number formatter.
> >>
> >>This is my test Code
> >>var value:int="14999999999999999188.00";
> >>var formatter:NumberFormatter=new NumberFormatter(); value
> >>=formatter.format(value); trace(value);
> >>
> >>After trace the value i get is this "15,000,000,000,000,000,000"
> >>
> >>It returns me above value. I think it is maximum number is there any
> >>other way to so that I can get proper value.
> >>
> >>
> >>Regards
> >>Virat
> >>MASTEK LTD.
> >>In the US, we're called MAJESCOMASTEK
> >>
> >>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>~
> >>~~~
> >>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>Opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual and not
> >>that of Mastek Limited, unless specifically indicated to that effect.
> >>Mastek Limited does not accept any responsibility or liability for it.
> >>This e-mail and attachments (if any) transmitted with it are
> >>confidential and/or privileged and solely for the use of the intended
> >>person or entity to which it is addressed. Any review,
> >>re-transmission, dissemination or other use of or taking of any action
> >>in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than
> >>the intended recipient is prohibited. This e-mail and its attachments
> >>have been scanned for the presence of computer viruses. It is the
> >>responsibility of the recipient to run the virus check on e-mails and
> >>attachments before opening them. If you have received this e-mail in
> >>error, kindly delete this e-mail from desktop and server.
> >>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>~
> >>~~~
> >>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>
> >
>
> MASTEK LTD.
> In the US, we're called MAJESCOMASTEK
>
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual and not that
> of Mastek Limited, unless specifically indicated to that effect. Mastek
> Limited does not accept any responsibility or liability for it. This e-mail
> and attachments (if any) transmitted with it are confidential and/or
> privileged and solely for the use of the intended person or entity to which
> it is addressed. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of
> or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or
> entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. This e-mail and
> its attachments have been scanned for the presence of computer viruses. It
> is the responsibility of the recipient to run the virus check on e-mails
> and attachments before opening them. If you have received this e-mail in
> error, kindly delete this e-mail from desktop and server.
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>

Reply via email to