Well if you think about QTP it's actually extremely cheap :-) I tried both tools some time ago and would prefer RiaTest out of the set of those tools as I could write my tests in Java (JUnit, TestNG) and include the tests in my Maven CI build.
BUT ... my favorite tool still is SilkTest/Silk4J as this simply worked best when I did the evaluation ... it has been reported that the newer Selenium WebDriver versions aren't bad, but I haven't tried the Flex support in some years ;-) Chris PS: Quite old, but it should still be a good starting point: https://dev.c-ware.de/confluence/display/PUBLIC/Functional+Testing+Tools ________________________________________ Von: Jason Taylor <[email protected]> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. Februar 2015 20:22 An: [email protected] Betreff: RE: Ranorex it works, but is incredibly expensive. We have found RiaTest suits our needs far better. ~ JT -----Original Message----- From: mark goldin [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 7:45 AM To: users Subject: Ranorex Anyone can share any experience using Ranorex tool? Thanks
