We use Ranorex, but drive it via the robot framework, so integrates well into CI tooling.
Works for us. On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Christofer Dutz <[email protected] > wrote: > Well if you think about QTP it's actually extremely cheap :-) > > I tried both tools some time ago and would prefer RiaTest out of the set > of those tools as I could write my tests in Java (JUnit, TestNG) and > include the tests in my Maven CI build. > > BUT ... my favorite tool still is SilkTest/Silk4J as this simply worked > best when I did the evaluation ... it has been reported that the newer > Selenium WebDriver versions aren't bad, but I haven't tried the Flex > support in some years ;-) > > Chris > > PS: Quite old, but it should still be a good starting point: > https://dev.c-ware.de/confluence/display/PUBLIC/Functional+Testing+Tools > > > ________________________________________ > Von: Jason Taylor <[email protected]> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. Februar 2015 20:22 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: RE: Ranorex > > it works, but is incredibly expensive. We have found RiaTest suits our > needs far better. > ~ JT > > -----Original Message----- > From: mark goldin [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 7:45 AM > To: users > Subject: Ranorex > > Anyone can share any experience using Ranorex tool? > > Thanks >
