You can also use AS3 Workers.

Thanks,
Om
On Jun 25, 2015 7:46 AM, "mark goldin" <markzolo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I see. Alex, I am looking into the article you have provided. Just a quick
> question. Where do I put my code to process xml? Because you code is
> rendering screen I am not sure how to adapt your code to my needs.
>
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 9:33 AM Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> > That sounds like pseudo-threading.  You would have to break it up in one
> > frame, handle chunks in separate frames, and assemble in the last frame.
> > With pseudo-threading, you don’t have to break it up and lose parenting
> > and re-assemble, you just keep some state around, and process chunks in
> > each frame.
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 6/25/15, 7:20 AM, "mark goldin" <markzolo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >What if I break xml into pieces for separate processing and then put
> them
> > >together into one final xml?
> > >
> > >On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 9:12 AM Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Well, xml is terribly slow.  If you can server-side process it into
> > >> something else (RemoteObject/AMF to ValueObjects is considered to be
> the
> > >> fastest, ObjectProxy is also slow, JSON might be fast) then you might
> be
> > >> able to process all of the data in 60 seconds in ActionScript.
> However,
> > >> if one of your customers happens to be running a virus scan or some
> > >>other
> > >> heavy job at the same time, you might find it exceeds 60 seconds
> anyway.
> > >>
> > >> Workers or Pseudo-threading [1] might help you.  Also having the
> server
> > >>do
> > >> the processing and send you the results.
> > >>
> > >> -Alex
> > >>
> > >> [1]
> > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui/2008/01/threads_in_actionscript_3.html
> > >>
> > >> On 6/25/15, 6:52 AM, "mark goldin" <markzolo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >I have a large xml data that UI needs to process. I am getting the
> > >>above
> > >> >message about timing out. Not sure I can break my function into
> smaller
> > >> >pieces. Any other idea?
> > >> >
> > >> >Thanks
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to