Since I'm not a CF expert, I fell for what far too many people often fall for with these tech blogs and so-called articles--I assumed the author was competent and knew something I didn't. Especially dangerous when the topic is Flash these days. Yes he probably confused Flash forms with remoting because there doesn't seem to be any evidence of that claim on that page.
-- Lou On Sun, 17 Apr 2016 15:04:49 +0700 Paul Hastings <[email protected]> wrote: > On 4/17/2016 12:47 PM, Lou wrote: > > > very credible anyway: "There’s a few items getting the axe. We can’t > > complain, in particular they were either unnecessary or a hassle – flash > > remoting for example." > > but his own lists don't have flash remoting anywhere unless he thinks flash > forms is the same. and "soon to be removed"? its like he doesn't know cf at > all. > what a crock. > > > Not sure I like the word "yet" at the end of that quote. Even if you factor > > out Flash (which IMO we shouldn't), can't an AIR application talk to CF? > > (I'm not actually a CF guy.) > > yes AIR can use the same flash remoting mechanism. > > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
