I guess the tone wasn't obvious, I wasn't being serious. Although, I remember "back in the day" when Spring used to package a bunch of dependencies in their own downloads. That was much easier to deal with. Ah well..
-- Lou On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 07:19:54 +0000 Christofer Dutz <[email protected]> wrote: > And what's wrong to download the jars from Maven central (You can do that > manually by clicking in a browser) > http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cga%7C1%7Cg%3A%22org.apache.flex.blazeds%22 > > I could come up with a binary assembly, but you were the first to request > this ... so all the others seem to be ok with this :-) > > Chris > > ________________________________________ > Von: Lou <[email protected]> > Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. April 2016 06:01 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: AW: BlazeDS, GraniteDS > > Yes I was pleased to learn that Gradle can use Maven repos. So what's wrong > with downloading some jars yourself, not tough enough eh? That's old school, > good stuff! haha > > -- > Lou > > On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 09:08:06 +0000 > Christofer Dutz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Well Gradle actually does use Maven repositories for resolving artifacts > > and you can easily use Ant+Ivy to resolve artifacts using Ant as well, so > > the distribution path of using Maven-Central is the only option that > > services all popular build tools at once. Of course, if you don't have > > internet, that's a problem. But then downloading a zip of jars should be > > equally challenging ;-) > > > > ________________________________________ > > Von: Lou <[email protected]> > > Gesendet: Montag, 18. April 2016 06:56 > > An: [email protected] > > Betreff: Re: BlazeDS, GraniteDS > > > > Well I'm not complaining (okay, I suppose I was a little), but there are > > probably cases where Maven/Ant aren't being used (Gradle?), although Ant is > > fairly universal. There are definitely cases where these tools cannot > > connect directly (think secure corporate networks with aggressive firewall > > rules, or even no Internet access at all). It would be the preference for > > us (w/MD5s of course), but I understand the challenges. The assumption > > that everyone is using Maven and can build themselves is far better than > > "nobody cares" enough for binaries! > > > > -- > > Lou > > > > On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 04:18:26 +0000 > > Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On 4/16/16, 3:34 PM, "Lou" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > >I noticed that Apache doesn't do convenience binaries for Blaze (is it > > > >due to infrequent use?) > > > > > > Do you mean a package of files similar to how Adobe shipped BlazeDS? I > > > think we thought just about every BlazeDS user was using Maven. Anyone > > > who prefers the package of files please speak up. We can certainly > > > release a similar package of files, but in theory, you can also build that > > > package yourself. I think the Ant files are in the source package to > > > create a similar package, and if not, maybe you can help us make it so. > > > > > > Let us know if you can't use Ant to build such a package. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > -Alex > > > > > > > --- > > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > > https://www.avast.com/antivirus > > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
