Have you tried FDT? On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Christofer Dutz <[email protected]> wrote:
> Well I haven't checked, but I doubt that this would require core > modifications, cause IntelliJ is built up very modular. I would be really > surprised if this wasn't possible to be fixed in the plugin. > > > Currently I have my plate really full of work with the next FlexJS release > and some work on BlazeDS Spring-Boot-Support, but feel free to dig in there > yourself. I remember fixing some minor issues in the Flexmojos support last > year and it wasn't difficult to get the changes in. > > > Chris > > ________________________________ > Von: pwave <[email protected]> > Gesendet: Samstag, 9. Juli 2016 00:50:13 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: AW: IDE Dilemma > > 1. Is the addition of Worker breakpoints in IntelliJ within the > scope/capablities of the Flex plugin? Is it something I can work on, or > does > it require modification to the core IDEA code? > 2. I like IntelliJ as well. Are you not using Workers? > 3. I firmly believe FlexJS is inevitable. For enterprise applications, Flex > is the way to go. > > I'd like to switch to IntelliJ, but the worker issue is stopping me. > > Joe > > > > Christofer Dutz wrote > > well IntelliJ has the big benefit, that they open-sourced the Flex plugin > > and at least we can add patches, that the Jetbrains guys are happy to > test > > and integrate. I still am betting quite a bit on IntelliJ, but for me > > personally Flash Builder is indeed dead. > > > > > > And who knows, if FlexJS gains more traction, perhaps the Jetbrains guys > > might even start pushing support again. > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > > http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/IDE-Dilemma-tp12955.html > > Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/IDE-Dilemma-tp12955p12959.html > Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
