Hi Prashant, Yes, the RemoteObjectAMFTest only tries to send a String. To handle true ValueObjects we would need to leverage the amfjs class mapping. I added code to the compiler to generate a map for the [RemoteClass] metadata but I didn't hook that up on the JS side yet. It sounds like the interest is in backporting amfjs to AS and make the API similar to regular Flex. In that case, I will refactor the amfjs class map to use the one in our Reflection library.
-Alex On 8/23/17, 9:08 AM, "PKumar" <prashaku...@gmail.com> wrote: >Alex, > >It will really great, if this works same or mostly similar as regular Flex >SDK. > >One more point on amfJS library , it also supports class mapping. It has >one method *registerClasses* that can be used for Java class to flex >mapping. > >On 23-Aug-2017 11:12 AM, "Alex Harui-2 [via Apache Flex Users]" < >ml+s2333346n15798...@n4.nabble.com> wrote: > >> So, I played around with AMF today, adding SWF code for RemoteObject. >>For >> me, the RemoteObjectAMFTest in examples/flexjs is working against the >> SampleAmfWebApp in examples/amf for both SWF and JS. I don't think I >>had >> to touch the JS code in amf.js. That's better than I was expecting. >>Am I >> not doing something right or is there some other problem that needs >> solving? >> >> Some observations along the way: >> >> I was able to talk to the server in SWF code just by using >> NetConnection.call and passing in CommandMessages and RemotingMessages, >> but the amf.js code seems to be sending an ActionMessage wrapped around >> the CommandMessage and RemotingMessage. Is that wrapping what >> NetConnection does? >> >> I'm tempted to try to refactor amf.js into several AS classes. Is that >> worth doing or are there bigger fish to fry? >> >> The amf.js code includes a Promise implementation. If we refactor to >>AS, >> should we try to use promises or make the API more compatible with >>regular >> Flex? I'm leaning towards compatibility with regular Flex. >> >> Thoughts? >> -Alex >> >> On 8/21/17, 11:02 AM, "Harbs" <[hidden email] >> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=15798&i=0>> wrote: >> >> >There’s probably an advantage to converting it to FlexJS. You could >> >probably leverage BinaryData for some of the functionality. >> > >> >You can also create typedefs if you want. >> > >> >> On Aug 21, 2017, at 8:53 PM, PKumar <[hidden email] >> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=15798&i=1>> wrote: >> >> >> >> Alex, >> >> >> >> As per my analysis & testing, AMFJS supports following features: >> >> >> >> - All dataType serialization & deserialization support including >> >>Object , >> >> Vector >> >> - Connection with BlazeDS >> >> - Conection with AMFPHP >> >> - Class Mapping Support using Alias Name & Class >> >> - Inbuilt support for sending AMF request & response >> >> >> >> I also checked James ward implementation but that does not support >> >>vector >> >> and blazeds connectivity. >> >> >> >> I prepared a demo for class mapping and blazeDs connection. If you >> >>want to >> >> check, please let me know. I will share on github. >> >> >> >> one query i want to ask , can we convert this amfJS library to >>FlexJS >> >> Typedef just like createJS library? >> >> >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Prashant >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ----- >> >> Regards, >> >> Prashant >> >> -- >> >> View this message in context: >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= >> http%3A%2F%2Fapache-fl >> >>>>ex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com%2FRemote-object-for-Flex-JS-tp15510p1578 >>>>2. >> >> >>>>html&data=02%7C01%7C%7C1af098eb84194e4a169c08d4e8bebf0f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b344 >>>>38 >> >> >>>>794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636389353321386860&sdata=9Vgilc%2FEEN6eQEGj >>>>Dw >> >> >>mmQV8N952XqBSbgweg1VQ41g4%3D&reserved=0 >> >> Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion >> below: >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-fl >>ex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com%2FRemote-object-for-Flex-JS-&data=02%7C01% >>7C%7C3a1ce1deff3f47dff8ef08d4ea413522%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1% >>7C0%7C0%7C636391013164618149&sdata=%2FOcSNyohTV1%2FJaKe%2BgW%2BHspE%2FV%2 >>FtaoyEdCq2YOzUmq4%3D&reserved=0 >> tp15510p15798.html >> To start a new topic under Apache Flex Users, email >> ml+s2333346n1...@n4.nabble.com >> To unsubscribe from Apache Flex Users, click here >> >><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-f >>lex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com%2Ftemplate%2FNamlServlet.jtp%3Fmacro%3Dun >>subscribe_by_code%26node%3D1%26code%3DcHJhc2hha3VtYXJAZ21haWwuY29tfDF8LTU >>0MTcyMzE2NA&data=02%7C01%7C%7C3a1ce1deff3f47dff8ef08d4ea413522%7Cfa7b1b5a >>7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636391013164618149&sdata=oG9TQOL2WHDIm >>7ixmXea4gFCoUw4j8b0HUsYOw7f4Pk%3D&reserved=0==> >> . >> NAML >> >><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-f >>lex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com%2Ftemplate%2FNamlServlet.jtp%3Fmacro%3Dma >>cro_viewer%26id%3Dinstant_html%2521nabble%253Aemail.naml%26base%3Dnabble. >>naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-n >>abble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace%26breadcrumbs%3Dnotify_subscribers% >>2521nabble%253Aemail.naml-instant_emails%2521nabble%253Aemail.naml-send_i >>nstant_email%2521nabble%253Aemail.naml&data=02%7C01%7C%7C3a1ce1deff3f47df >>f8ef08d4ea413522%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C63639101316 >>4618149&sdata=IBL7nGCu8Fr2VJyGGJvN4eo2j3ciNKaqdMySmNqzEH8%3D&reserved=0> >> > > > > >----- >Regards, >Prashant >-- >View this message in context: >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-fle >x-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com%2FRemote-object-for-Flex-JS-tp15510p15803.ht >ml&data=02%7C01%7C%7C3a1ce1deff3f47dff8ef08d4ea413522%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794 >aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636391013164618149&sdata=J3LsrJ3Zxc%2FxglCYj8zwcX >vDzIX9nCPn0S%2Brd%2BVE9O0%3D&reserved=0 >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
