Hi, Yes, we may target other output besides JS someday. Are there any you consider important?
Thanks in advance, -Alex On 9/15/17, 3:24 PM, "0xC3" <ts...@outlook.com> wrote: >To everybody we really do appreciate the hard work and accomplishments >made >by all involved. I really hope I did not come off negative, I wanted to >point to the amazing ability of knowing I could output to JS without >having >to know it, provided by everybody's hard work. > >Of course you would need to focus on the output product of the compiler >that's totally understandable. I was just trying to make a point that I >feel >Apache Flex, of which FlexJS is a part of, is larger than JS by way of >enabling other targets if needed/wanted. Honestly FlexJS was one of the >reasons we decided to stick with Flex vs other options. > >So, I guess my marketing point would be that FlexJS is not another JS >framework, it's a good structured language that happens to compile to JS >(among other thing). > >I apologize if I am missing the mark on FlexJS, full disclosure I haven't >made anything with it yet I am only going by what I have read on the >progress. > > > > >-- >Sent from: >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-fle >x-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7C06ba53eee6e6444cc9ad08d >4fc88815d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636411110600661538& >sdata=SoM1X3mVPS9Bqi81BzR0oBQeijgi093upfygqOFi5d0%3D&reserved=0
