> Our sweet spot is single page applications. > We are not a great fit for ... multi-page applications.
Can anyone expand on the above comment? Like Flex, isn't FlexJS geared towards enterprise applications that are fairly complex, where HTML is not a good fit? > On September 19, 2017 at 1:58 AM Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > To me, the key differentiators of FlexJS is: > > 1. We consider HTML a rendering engine rather than an authoring language. > 2. End-to-end tooling which eliminates a lot of the pain points of web app > development > 3. MXML > 4. Flexibly interchangeable component sets. > > Point #1 can be considered an advantage or a disadvantage depending on your > perspective. > > Our sweet spot is single page applications. > We are not a great fit for web sites and multi-page applications. > > One area which will give some folks pause is the lack of automated testing. > > I think our strongest market at the moment is for migrating applications from > Flash. I would like to see us strengthen our selling points for other devs as > well. > > My $0.02, > Harbs > > > On Sep 19, 2017, at 10:59 AM, Carlos Rovira <carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> > > wrote: > > > > Hi Berty, > > > > I think all points are ok but the second (security) don't know how much > > effort was put in that corner, maybe others could give some thoughts there, > > and I think nowadays is a key point. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Carlos > > > > > > 2017-09-19 4:15 GMT+02:00 Berty Tonta (Leadstalk) <berty.to...@leadstalk.pro > >> : > > > >> My first short list of why people should go for FlexJS. > >> Disclaimer: as a non-developer, I'm not sure if they really apply today to > >> FlexJS and if there are more engaging features for developers. Would be > >> great to have your confirmation. > >> > >> 1. Enterprise-class: for As3/Flex robust platform/architecture > >> 2. Security: I need confirmation here. > >> 3. Advanced multi-platform: Out of the box and future-proof (@Olaf, I > >> agree) > >> 4. Open-source: We must encourage more developers to embrace it and more > >> organisations to buy-in...not just Adobe. > >> > >> If think the above list (or something along those lines) can send the > >> message: "Hey, guys, this is serious stuff: We're taking Enterprse (not > >> games), Security (at it's core), ADVANCED multi-platform (swift low-cost > >> development/deployment) and a growing/serious community of contributors" > >> > >> OK now. How true is this? If not, is this compatible with the Vision for > >> FlexJS? > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Berty Tonta > >> > >> ____________________________________________________________ > >> ________________ > >> > >> > >> > >> LEADSTALK - 4 BENGALI STREET, BEAU BASSIN, MAURITIUS > >> TEL +230 57 43 81 34 - berty.to...@leadstalk.pro - LEADSTALK.PRO > >> > >> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:40 AM, Olaf Krueger <m...@olafkrueger.net> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> an important thing for me is sustainability. > >>> Every day a new JS framework is born and another dies. > >>> Angular was written from scratch... all who have invested in Angular1 > >> were > >>> lost. > >>> This is not suitable for the enterprise. > >>> > >>> My understanding is that FlexJS was built with the experience of over a > >>> decade of Flex development. > >>> So my hope is that the architecture is well-thought-out and future-proof. > >>> > >>> If we'll speak about WebAssembly or whatever other targets someday... > >>> FlexJS > >>> has the potential to fit for them all... hopefully ;-) > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Olaf > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Sent from: http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/ > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > > > <http://www.codeoscopic.com> > > > > Carlos Rovira > > > > Director General > > > > M: +34 607 22 60 05 > > > > http://www.codeoscopic.com > > > > http://www.avant2.es > > > > > > Conocenos en 1 minuto! <https://youtu.be/P2IEAYDG5HU> > > > > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener > > información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por > > error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y > > proceda a su destrucción. > > > > De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos > > que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC > > S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del > > servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso, > > rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras > > oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación > > necesaria. >
