Unfortunately I only know the server side really well on .net, client side we 
are switching operations over to Uno Platform for threading performance and c#
~ JT

-----Original Message-----
From: Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> 
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 4:36 AM
To: users@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Future proof Flex/Flash apps.

Hi Jason,

RTMP is still missing in Royale. Would you consider to port that for 
Javascript/SWF as we did for AMF?
I think it will be a great addition to the Royale arsenal and will make many 
people that was using RTMP in Flash come to Royale

El mar., 15 oct. 2019 a las 21:45, Jason Taylor (<jtay...@dedoose.com>)
escribió:

> FluorineFX is the backend AMF layer for .net projects.   FluorineFX has
> been ported to .net core https://github.com/hinaria/fluorinefx-core 
> and https://github.com/liuyunxiong/rtmpsharp, if you need further help 
> regarding FluorineFX or RTMP, RTMPS for .net you can always hit me for help.
> ~ JT
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2019 11:55 PM
> To: users@flex.apache.org; pa...@compuace.com; us...@royale.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Future proof Flex/Flash apps.
>
> Royale (and any Apache project) will be around as long as there are 3 
> active committers/PMC members.  You can become one of them by 
> contributing to the project (code, doc, bugs, marketing, whatever).  
> That way you can truly have a stake in the future.  No corporation can shut 
> down Royale.
>
> Nobody has gone into production on the MX/Spark emulation component set.
> I think Alina's team is close.  The tourdeflex migration example might 
> give you an idea of what it can currently do, but really, the goal is 
> to make it work as well as you need it.  We are looking for folks who 
> want to help us improve it.  The mindset has to be different from the 
> Adobe days when you could just wait for Adobe to cut another release 
> for you to use.  It is important that people get involved, even if it is just 
> reporting bugs.
> There is no dedicated test team for Apache Royale.  There was for 
> Adobe Flex.  There is no corporation pushing this technology.  The 
> users are supposed to help with the pushing and pulling.
>
> I'm not sure where the source code is for FlourineFX.  It might be 
> transpilable to JS.  It appears to use AMF underneath.  So maybe you 
> have some work to do there, but in the whole, it should be far less 
> work than migrating all of your code.  See if you can figure out what 
> FlourineFX APIs you used and we can discuss emulating those.
>
> HTH,
> -Alex
>
> On 10/12/19, 9:20 AM, "Paul Stearns" <pa...@compuace.com.INVALID> wrote:
>
>     Carlos:
>
>     The applications we have written really do want to be desktop 
> applications. Having a small subset of functionality for mobile use 
> would be beneficial for a few of the applications we support. Mostly 
> however these are data entry focused applications. One of the 
> applications captures over 200 data elements in a single data entry 
> screen with complex business rules, using a tabbed interface.
>
>     With Royale, I have some questions/concerns;
>
>     Will it be around for 10 years?How many users/companies have 
> adopted Royale?Are there any applications, perhaps with similar look & 
> feel.as what this app shows, already functional in Royale? If not 
> similar, at least some applications I can see and touch.I use 
> FluorineFX as my data layer interface. Will that be transportable?
>     Thanks for your help.
>
>     Paul R. Stearns
>     Advanced Consulting Enterprises, Inc.
>
>     15280 NW 79th Ct.
>     Suite 250
>     Miami Lakes, Fl 33016
>
>     Voice: (305)623-0360 x107
>     Fax: (305)623-4588
>
>     ----------------------------------------
>     From: Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org>
>     Sent: 10/12/19 4:48 AM
>     To: "pa...@compuace.com" <pa...@compuace.com>, users@flex.apache.org
>     Subject: Re: Future proof Flex/Flash apps.
>     Hi Paul,
>
>     as Alex I think your best route is to join us in Apache Royale mailing
>     lists [1] and try emulation components. This will be the fastest way to
>     migrate to html/js touching almost no code. Royale is now in a 
> very good
>     state for everyone to start using it. I encourage you to join our 
> community
>     and get started here [2]
>
>     [1]
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Froyale.apache.org%2Fmailing-lists%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C21efbb9d0bce4dbeb41e08d74f301859%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C637064940295311587&amp;sdata=I%2BLA2byTf4zKIIIbTr0sELMvASa8P1anWU5B3wDkMj8%3D&amp;reserved=0
>     [2]
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapac
> he.github.io%2Froyale-docs%2Fget-started&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40a
> dobe.com%7C21efbb9d0bce4dbeb41e08d74f301859%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c1
> 78decee1%7C0%7C1%7C637064940295311587&amp;sdata=ng5M33bfbxYJVCZdT70Ksb
> 5WzwX6n0XS4SaxF7P1w1U%3D&amp;reserved=0
>
>     best
>
>     El sáb., 12 oct. 2019 a las 8:56, Alex Harui ()
>     escribió:
>
>     > From 3 minutes of playing around with it, if you are looking to 
> minimize
>     > code changes and don't want a more modern UI, then the emulation 
> component
>     > set (MXRoyale and SparkRoyale) would be a good place to start. The
>     > emulation set is still a work-in-progress, but it gets better 
> every day,
>     > and, IMO, it would be better for the Royale community if you 
> could invest
>     > some of the time saved from not having to change so much code towards
>     > further improving MXRoyale and SparkRoyale as that will make the 
> migration
>     > effort easier for the next person.
>     >
>     > My 2 cents,
>     > -Alex
>     >
>     > On 10/11/19, 3:21 PM, "Paul Stearns" wrote:
>     >
>     > So that I could get better feed back on which route I should take, I
>     > have created a demo version of one of my applications.
>     >
>     > This is a time accounting application which we developed and use
>     > internally to keep track of hours to pay consultants and bill 
> clients.
>     >
>     > The URL is
>     >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflex.yozyo.net%2Fproduction&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C21efbb9d0bce4dbeb41e08d74f301859%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C637064940295311587&amp;sdata=pX6%2FdPt6xfKyVUDC%2FsXmPQSkt8TFwx1HZD%2FJwXEZ2J0%3D&amp;reserved=0
>     >
>     > To login, you can use either;
>     >
>     > U: dmanager
>     > P: mpassword
>     >
>     > U:duser
>     > P:UPASSWORD
>     >
>     > It requires popups to be enabled. The application provides a self
>     > contained desktop like application with the ability to have 
> multiple panels
>     > open simultaneously. While this is a test system, and you are 
> welcome to
>     > muck about and save data please don't intentionally try to break it.
>     >
>     > My goal is to end up with an application with a similar look and feel
>     > to what is provided using something that won't die in December 2020.
> Of
>     > course the less work to get from here to there will be the best 
> approach.
>     >
>     > Paul R. Stearns
>     > Advanced Consulting Enterprises, Inc.
>     >
>     > 15280 NW 79th Ct.
>     > Suite 250
>     > Miami Lakes, Fl 33016
>     >
>     > Voice: (305)623-0360 x107
>     > Fax: (305)623-4588
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>
>     --
>     Carlos Rovira
>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout
> .me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C21efbb9d0bc
> e4dbeb41e08d74f301859%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C637
> 064940295311587&amp;sdata=cvUi0iL2%2FAw3bfNcD9NczUIxpJbLvk0q5q635lDX%2
> BxE%3D&amp;reserved=0
>
>
>
>
>
>

--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Reply via email to