P.Marek wrote: > Hello Sheldon! > > Nice to hear from you. > >> On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 19:56 +0200, P.Marek wrote: >>> The default value is 0, which is compatible with earlier versions, as >>> my suggestion for nested WCs is to avoid them, or at least ignore the >>> shared paths. >> To clarify: >> >> Distribution packagers can ignore the working copy directory option, >> because it is not the default. > Yes, please. > > If you feel that there's a real need you could provide a package with that > option set to > 8 ... but I don't think that's necessary. > > I think most people just keep /etc or / versioned; and using multiple > overlayed URLs > does/will work much better than having multiple working copies. > > Or does someone backup each /home/* directory as its own working copy? >
I have a setup where I backup /etc to a central repository, but backup /var/www to a local repository. I am actually running 1.1.16, because 1.1.17 does not support authentication properly[1]. Does this mean I can not do this anymore with 1.2.x ? What are my alternatives? Also in the initial announcement you say: > The delay can be explained by it being *incompatible* with the older > versions What exactly does this mean? Can I attempt to upgrade at some point or...? [1] First problem at http://www.nabble.com/Congratulations-for-fsvs-1.1.17..-but-here-are-my-first-problems-%3A)-td20230999.html ------------------------------------------------------ http://fsvs.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=3928&dsMessageId=2364125 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]].
