On Oct 11, 2010, at 11:41 , Eric Lemoine wrote: > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Andreas Hocevar <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Our documentation is not just the API docs. > > That is why I was suggesting to use docs.geoext.org instead of > api.geoext.org - api.geoext.org sounded too specific to me.
Good point, but see below why it is like this. > So the docs for the current release will be available at > http://geoext.org, the docs for the trunk will be available at > http://dev.geoext.org/docs/, and the docs for older stable releases > will be available at http://api.geoext.org/<x>.<y>/docs. Don't you > think we should try to make things a bit more consistent here? For > example by (also) having http://geoext.org/trunk and > http://geoext.org/<x>.<y> for the trunk docs and the old versions > docs, respectively. What we have under http://api.geoext.org/x.y/ is an unzipped release bundle, with the subfolders script/, lib/, examples/, resources/, and docs/. So it is not just the api, but the whole release. Also, in the release bundle, the "website" (docs/examples.html) uses a relative path to access the examples (../examples). So this is all consistent. If this still feels wrong, I am not opposed to a different structure, but I don't have time to make any further changes myself. Regards, Andreas. -- Andreas Hocevar OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org/ Expert service straight from the developers. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://www.geoext.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
