On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Andreas Hocevar <[email protected]> wrote: > On Oct 11, 2010, at 11:41 , Eric Lemoine wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Andreas Hocevar <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Our documentation is not just the API docs. >> >> That is why I was suggesting to use docs.geoext.org instead of >> api.geoext.org - api.geoext.org sounded too specific to me. > > Good point, but see below why it is like this. > >> So the docs for the current release will be available at >> http://geoext.org, the docs for the trunk will be available at >> http://dev.geoext.org/docs/, and the docs for older stable releases >> will be available at http://api.geoext.org/<x>.<y>/docs. Don't you >> think we should try to make things a bit more consistent here? For >> example by (also) having http://geoext.org/trunk and >> http://geoext.org/<x>.<y> for the trunk docs and the old versions >> docs, respectively. > > What we have under http://api.geoext.org/x.y/ is an unzipped release bundle, > with the subfolders script/, lib/, examples/, resources/, and docs/. So it is > not just the api, but the whole release. Also, in the release bundle, the > "website" (docs/examples.html) uses a relative path to access the examples > (../examples). So this is all consistent. > > If this still feels wrong, I am not opposed to a different structure, but I > don't have time to make any further changes myself.
I'm not opposed to the current structure. I just think we could have geoext.org/trunk and geoext.org/<x>.<y> and advertize these links when pointing to the docs of trunk and specific versions. I can set this up once you're done with the release, and if people agree. -- Eric Lemoine Camptocamp France SAS Savoie Technolac, BP 352 73377 Le Bourget du Lac, Cedex Tel : 00 33 4 79 44 44 96 Mail : [email protected] http://www.camptocamp.com _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://www.geoext.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
