Hi James, Barbara, *, 2011/1/30 James Wilde <[email protected]>: > > On Jan 30, 2011, at 21:47 , Barbara Duprey wrote: > >> On 1/30/2011 6:35 AM, James Wilde wrote: >>> Sorry, no, Phil. No-one can unsubscribe you. Here's a suggestion: >>> >>> Empty your mailbox of stuff from [email protected]. Then unsubscribe >>> from the address you believe you are subescribed under, which naturally >>> enough is the one which receives the emails. There is normally only a few >>> seconds' delay between sending your message and getting the reply to act >>> on. If you don't get one, check an incoming email and see if the address >>> is the one you thought. You might have another email address which you >>> forward to your main address. >>> >>> The address to send your mail to is at the bottom of this mail. Clicking >>> or right-clicking on that should open an email message to send. >> >> No, that goes to users+help, not to [email protected] >> (apparently to accommodate the differences for people who subscribed to the >> digest -- or used -nomail, in which case I have no idea why they'd bother to >> unsubscribe). Whoever is trying to unsubscribe will probably get there in >> the end, though. But if they don't know the subscribed address, they'll need >> to look at the Return-Path header and pick out the indirect form (using >> equals instead of at) of the subscribed address, and unsubscribe that.
Yes, the footer says clearly: Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] So you send a message, to get the unsubscribe instructions. As you said, there's a difference in the mailto-address for the "regular mail" and the "digest" version of the mailing list. The "no-mail" option exists for those people who follow the lists through a news gateway like gmane. You need to be subscribed, to send messages, but you'll get the replies through your newsreader. So there's no need to send you the mails extra. >> Question to moderator/owner -- the help doesn't describe anything that uses >> the indirect form in the case of a subscribed address that is no longer >> directly accessible. Does that capability exist? How does it work, if so? > > As to your question, I don't know the answer, and we'll have to wait for the > owner. I'm just a moderator. I don't know, if this possibility exists for the lists at libreoffice.org. I am a moderator too, but I haven't come across anything like it. I might ask on the moderators list, if this is possible - if James isn't faster. :) Sigrid -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
