You have just demonstrated a complete lack of understanding about IT and have __obviously__ never ever found yourself in the middle of a multi-million dollar lawsuit between two massive corporations. If you had you would never speak so far out your rectal orifice in public. I have been in that situation and my side won, not just some counts, ALL counts. For the most part the other side lost because they "edited and middle posted" in their emails so when placed on the stand had to work from memory because the email they had in their hand was missing everything damning.
I won't bother responding to you. It is obvious that you are both unemployed and unemployable, having no industry knowledge or experience what-so-ever. On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 14:56 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: > On 2011-05-30 11:42 AM, Roland Hughes wrote: > > Editing and/or responding within the "original message" is considered > > tampering with evidence. > > Rotflmao even harder! > > Roland, where do you get this garbage? Do you make it up as you go? > > > Everyone is supposed to TOP POST, not only to save developer time, > > Stop it, please, my sides are hurting! > > > but to allow the legal teams to read from the bottom up on the last > > message identifying how things progressed this far. > > Sorry, I don't modify my personal habits to fit the needs of Outlook > weened lawyer drones. > > The chain of evidence for legal purposes is in the ORIGINAL emails, not > endlessly/mindlessly quoted copies of stupid email signatures and > mindless and unenforceable legal disclaimers. > -- Roland Hughes, President Logikal Solutions (630)-205-1593 http://www.theminimumyouneedtoknow.com http://www.infiniteexposure.net No U.S. troops have ever lost their lives defending our ethanol reserves. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted