Hi all,
Apparently we find ourselves in an interesting situation. With the 3.4.0
release, there are obviously more questions, people stumbling over bugs.
- So to help the users, it is useful to point them to the fact that
there is a stable 3.3.2 (3.3.3 soon) that they can use with more comfort.
- However ... it is both valuable for the project, when the all do
some work with the 'early adopter' versions.
So, I would propose that the regular helping hands on this list, try to
allow for both interests. Apart from the mentioned arguments, it may as
well be appealing for quite some people to, to try working with relative
new features etc etc.
What do you think, would it be possible and useful (of course depending
on the individual mail) to pay attention to both aspects?
That would obviously result in an attitude in which people are not only
pushed back from the 3.4.0 to an older version, nor withhold explanation
about the choice they have to work with one or another.. Well, each can
find his own short or long sentences to explain :-)
some related links:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport
http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2011/05/13/announcing-a-new-beta-release/
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Adapt-o-meter.png
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Release_Criteria
Cheers,
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected]
In case of problems unsubscribing, write to [email protected]
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
