On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 10:39 -0700, upscope wrote: > On Saturday, June 11, 2011 01:35:34 AM Cor Nouws wrote: > > Hi planas, > > > > planas wrote (11-06-11 06:12) > > > > > On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 03:18 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote: > > >> That would obviously result in an attitude in which people are not > > >> only pushed back from the 3.4.0 to an older version, nor withhold > > >> explanation about the choice they have to work with one or > > >> another.. Well, each can find his own short or long sentences to > > >> explain :-) > > > > > > I have noticed that 3.4.0 seems to support 2010 docx and xlsx > > > formats better than 3.3.2. I have not had any major issues with > > > 3.4.0, quirky one issue in Calc but not a show stopper. > > > > Indeed. That supports an approach to let people work with the new > > version too. Bugs however, are included. See e.g. > > http://www.libreoffice.org/download/release-notes/#LO340 > > > > Best, > Can you install both at same time? > > I would like to test 3.4.0 to see if any of the calc problems I have > with 3.3.2 are fixed. >
ON Windows were 3.4.0 is no I could not. I have not update Linux from 3.3.2 or installed 3.4.0 along side yet. The wierd part about MSO compatibility is I need both for different reasons. At work our server MS Server 2003 does not understand any MSO format after XP/2003 but a group I work has users who insist that everyone uses MSO200&?2010 even those who have earlier MSO versions. -- Jay Lozier jsloz...@gmail.com -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@global.libreoffice.org In case of problems unsubscribing, write to postmas...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
