Hi Cour (none of the following criticisms are directed at you, who are one of the few (only?) members of the SC who sees this project as a productivity tool for the users)
I don't know if you are aware that installing LibO 3.4.0 under Windows silently uninstalls 3.3 without asking (even if the installer is run in customized mode). Therefore it is not possible to have both versions installed under Windows. I know this is possible under Linux but this project doesn't care a f*ck about Windows users (even though they are the majority of users, but hey, who cares?) so one can only recommend one version OR the other. Given the degree of regression and bugs added (I totally agree with Tom that 3.4.0 "sounds more like a beta-release") and that the developers are not too worried about regressions, in my opinion if someone is using 3.3.2 for work (and believe me: even if the LO site has a disclaimer about 3.4 being experimental, all other download sites/mirrors don't, so expect a LOT of angry users in the near future) I will not recommend 3.4 for anything other than playing around. In my opinion, releasing 3.4.0 as Stable was a major error and a shot on the foot for this project. But the all-mighty Release Schedule as to be met, no matter what comes out of it... Regards, Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/helping-Users-and-LibreOffice-proposal-tp3051441p3052293.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] In case of problems unsubscribing, write to [email protected] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
