Tim Deaton wrote > > Some other programs a few years back introduced the idea of "skins". If > we're going to experiment with new user interfaces (and I expect LO will > have to), I think the "skins" concept would be most appropriate. If > necessary, re-engineer the underlying commands so that they are not > dependent on the hierarchy of a particular type of user interface. Then > let the current UI become one skin, Pedro's ideas become another, etc. >
That would be perfect. Even if it's not a free-form skinning interface, it would be fantastic to have the option to load e.g. Classic, Widescreen, Ribbon or to create and import/export a user customized interface. This is particularly useful when you have fine tuned the buttons you need/ don't need. This would allow the user to do it only once instead of in each computer you use. Contrary to what some people think this is not a pointless idea just for the skinning/tunning geeks. This is actually a way that any user can improve productivity by having the functions (s)he uses most at the most convenient position. It would be fantastic if LibreOffice chose this path of usability freedom ;) -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/New-design-tp3542274p3544615.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
