--- On Fri, 5/11/12, Jay Lozier <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Jay Lozier <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: HOWTO change all-user default file > formats (Windows), for LOo3.5? > To: [email protected] > Date: Friday, May 11, 2012, 11:45 AM > Andreas, > > On 05/11/2012 02:04 PM, Andreas Säger wrote: > > Am 11.05.2012 19:59, Doug wrote: > >>> > >> I know this is not a popular opinion with certain > folks, but I believe > >> you should save ALL documents in either .doc or > .rtf format. Why keep > >> files in a > >> format most people can't read? Just because > Microsoft invented it is no > >> reason not to use it. You use their fonts, don't > you? > >> > >> --doug > >> > >> > > > > Believe what you want. It is a technical issue. > > > > > The ideal answer is for everyone to agree on and support > standard, non-proprietary formats for all document types and > not use proprietary formats. Unfortunately, in the US at > least, this is not true with office documents - MSO formats > are defacto standard for US businesses and most government > agencies. So we must to use a variety of methods to adapt to > the situation. [...] Exactly. MS gets to set standards because of its market dominance, and non-IT/non-geek types, many of whom are much too busy with other things to learn to do anything differently than before or simply want everything "their way" (i.e. the way MS has gotten them to think of as their way) expect everything to "work that way" and if you tell them otherwise at best they're prone to impatience and at worst they'll decide the software you recommended (and hence your expertise) is "no good," irrespective of the fact that they're asking you for help. Note that one of the reasons for Ubuntu's success is the "Ubuntu just works" goal/strategy. For LOo, "it just works" would mean letting users chose whatever they prefer, preferably with install defaults that won't cause them aggravation when they try to work with most other Office suite users, i.e. MSO users. Stack all the technical refinements you want against that aggravation, and unless those refinements are both significant and apparent to non-technical users you'll still have an uphill battle even if you're competing as $free: aggravation is part of the net cost, and whether people think of it in those terms explicitly, most people at least feel it. As many know, Steve Jobs was not a technical genius, but what he did get right (that most techie-types got wrong) was understanding that the key to market success (whether financial or user base) is making user experience appealing rather than frustrating. Say "Office suite" and most people are going to expect relatively automatic/transparent interoperability with the "Office suite" they know, without having to learn about "details" like .odt. .doc/.xls/.ppt are effectively like apples or rocks or other parts of the natural world. That's the prospective user-base we have, as opposed to whatever user-base we might prefer. > [...] I prefer to use ODF formats as my normal > format for all office documents and convert to an MSO format > when needed. > > The problem is that there are users with a wide variety of > skill levels and willingness to learn and this creates its > own problems. I know people who in practical terms computer > illiterate even though they use computers regularly. > Depending on the situation one may need to use a sub-optimal > solution to get work done while trying to implement the > technically correct solution. > > I understand the legitimate technical issues that you are > raising but unfortunately the problem is with the ultimate > end user. The real solution is social not technical of > training and education. My observation is there are > significant number of users who will resist doing the > technically correct procedure because they believe it is > extremely difficult even when it very simple. I know people > will not learn to use Powerpoint or Impress to make a slide > show or presentation; I actually have prepared presentations > for them. And I am not very proficient with either > Powerpoint or Impress because I rarely use it for my own > projects or work (more accurately almost never use it for > work or personal projects). Many don't want to know about more than one way of doing things (when you try to show them.) I suspect that some are a bit confused even with the way the "know" but have learned that if they just do the same thing they get the needed result that lets them get by. Nonetheless, when we do work for them that we want them to value, it has to be useful to them on their terms. > -- Jay Lozier > [email protected] > ultra -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
